Quantcast

People Who Make Plastic Bags Want You To Like Plastic Bags

plasticbags.jpg
"Plastic Bag Man" courtesy of Seattlest Flickr pool member Jill Rachel
Last week, Councilmember Mike "Credit Union" and the rest of the City Council floated a big idea: banning plastic bags in the city of Seattle. The idea came just after a report Port Townsend Marine Science Center, which estimated that people in Washington State use 2 billion plastic bags each year. But now, the Seattle Times reports, the decision is being criticized--by the people who make plastic bags.

Calling the proposal a "rush decision", Hilex Poly, the country's biggest manufacturer of the single-use bags is complaining that the decision targets their product, instead of other forms of plastic waste. According to the Times, Hilex Poly has said that they "strongly believe that punishing consumers is the wrong approach to reducing plastics litter."

Unfortunately for Hilex Poly, deferring attention away from plastic bags probably won't be hugely helpful in gaining empathy--particularly in the Puget Sound, where residents are already concerned about the health of the oceans. And while other plastic and trash are concerns, plastic bags are one of the easiest targets, with one of the clearest solutions. Who can forget the beached whale whose stomach was filled with single-use plastic bags?

In 2009, voters in King County narrowly defeated a tax on plastic bags--which was not a ban, but rather a small fee for use of the bags. And while many supported the idea of cutting down on the use of single-use plastic sacks, the tax was largely seen as regressive and harmful to poor people. An all-out ban, however, may gain more traction...and it's not getting put to the voters.

Additionally, other cities have already pioneered the trail (Portland and Bellingham among them)--and research is showing that Seattle (and Washington as a whole) are ready to follow suit.


Contact the author of this article or email tips@seattlest.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • minimark

    Thank for the quick reply - I really appreciate it!

    My main focus is on the fact that no, you didn't blame the manufacturer, yet you say the product they make needs to be banned because of the actions of the consumers(I know, the don't buy the bags, but they in principal pay for them).  The point I'm trying to make - and I DID read your article - is that you don't blame people for littering - you simply say that we've got to get rid of the product because it is ending up on the water.  I'm up a while (even in Dallas).  If you'd like I'll continue the debate!

  • minimark

    My problem with your this article is that you are blaming the manufacturer for the littering of individuals.  If you want to argue the impact of bags in a landfill or the impact of their manufacture, bring it on.  But blaming the manufacturer for the littering?  Think about it - it's lame and wrong.  Put a little more thought into your article.  I worked for a bag company in the past, and it's not like bad people work for the company.  Saying the habits of others - via improper waste disposal that impacts the environment - is the manufacturer's fault is wrong.  PERIOD.   People need to be more responsible for their actions, such as disposal of trash. I was going to post a trashing of you as an author, but I didn't want to litter;)

  • My problem with your/this (you choose) comment is that you clearly didn't read my/this (again, your call) article. This isn't anti-plastic bags, it's explaining a situation that is current occurring. Find a place in the article where I say that the manufacturer is to blame for littering. Where does this say anything about the manufacturer being wrong? Or where I actually give my opinion at all?

    Put a little more thought into actually reading things before commenting. 

  • minimark

    I guess you are correct in that you aren't making a call on the discussion, but when I see the individual's actions (littering) not addressed as a fault I get mad.  And you didn't do that.  - SORRY.  I guess I got a little over-agressive. Most reports have been super-negative and I tend to view them through those eyes. I read things between the lines that maybe I shouldn't. I apologize. The other side could maybe do the same. I just think the industry is getting a REALLY bad rep, and since I know many people who work for that company and it affects their livelihood, I take it personally.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@seattlest.com