Considering a Vacation Cruise?
We’ve never been a fan of cruise ships. The prospect of spending a week with the same set of people in what’s basically a gigantic floating shopping mall fills us with dread. And forget about eco-cruises: we love the ocean and the coast but cruising to Alaska seems like the equivalent of snowmobiling through Yellowstone--fun, superficially pretty, but ultimately not the best way to relax with nature. When we see cruise ships parked in Elliott Bay, their bulk rivaling most apartment buildings, we have to wonder what kind of environmental impact these behemoths have. Plus, "eco-cruises" might be a nice way to see whales, but they’re also a pretty good way to kill whales.
So we felt pretty vindicated when we saw that Friends of Earth had released a cruise line report card which rates the major cruise lines - no one gets an A, and the report card also contains quite a few Ds and Fs. The report card rates cruise lines on environmental sensitivity, including sewage treatment methods, air pollution reduction, compliance with water quality laws, and accessibility of cruise line environmental impact information.
Royal Caribbean, which offers offers seven-day cruises that depart Terminal 91 for Alaska every week, got a D in sewage treatment and an F in air pollution reduction. Slate estimates that your carbon footprint doubles each day you're on a cruise. You might as well idle your car for a week instead.
Our advice: If you want the cruise experience, stay home, watch a few episodes of Blue Planet and have a couple cocktails. Later, if you still think you're missing out on the cruise experience, read David Foster Wallace's "A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again" for a reminder of what you're avoiding.
Comments [rss]
-
Jenn Mikosz
-
Regis Lacher
-
TOS
-
EvilCornbread
-
EvilCornbread
-
EvilCornbread
-
BigGreenFrank
-
Joe G


