<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Seattle Presbytery Voting On Gay And Lesbian Ordination</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2009/03/17/seattle_presbytery_voting_on_gay_an.php</link>
<description>All comments for Seattle Presbytery Voting On Gay And Lesbian Ordination</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Morfydd</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2009/03/17/seattle_presbytery_voting_on_gay_an.php#comment-1614605</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2009/03/17/seattle_presbytery_voting_on_gay_an.php#comment-1614605</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 04:09:38 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I haven&apos;t been close to the Presbyterian church since confirmation more than 20 years ago, but my (very conservative) dad has summarized *his* anti- argument as:

1) The church doesn&apos;t recognize gay marriage.
2) Pastors, as spiritual leaders, should not unrepentantly sin.
3) The church considers extramarital sex to be a sin.

The church doesn&apos;t care who a pastor is attracted to, only about whether any sex he/she actually has is within a marriage.

The argument is logical, but it gives a cruel result.  My resolution would be to recognize gay marriage, but that may take another generation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
