Quantcast

Malcolm Gladwell on Why You Haven't Lived Up to Your Potential

malcolm_gladwell.jpg
Author Malcolm Gladwell
So Malcolm Gladwell shows up at Town Hall and asks the audience which talk they'd like: a long, in-depth talk with minimal Q&A; a medium-sized, generic talk with lengthier Q&A; or all Q&A. The event is sold out with people who have all paid $5 to hear Gladwell speak, but only three or four people raise their hands for the first option. Everyone else votes for the chance to hear themselves speak once Gladwell gets through with whatever he plans to go on about.

Which leads us to stupidity, the second of Gladwell's three factors that affect people making the most of their human potential (James Flynn's "capitalization"). The other two are poverty and attitude.

Of course everyone realizes poverty is an obstacle to achievement, Gladwell half-shouts to the Town Hall faithful from his lectern/pulpit, but almost no one appreciates how insurmountable growing up in poverty can be. He refers to a long-term study of top performers on a California IQ test--the top minds in the state were selected as children and followed to see what they'd accomplish. Only 15 percent "succeeded" in life. And the primary indicator of that success was class--"poverty trumped IQ," emphasizes Gladwell. "We underestimate what a burden it is."

By stupidity, Gladwell is more or less referring to systems and structures we create, without questioning what their effects are. His example here is the 2007 Czech Republic's junior hockey team. Because the cut-off date for admission is January 1, and the players are selected young, the overwhelming majority of them are those lucky enough to be born soon after January 1. They have nine months more growth and maturity than someone born in October. This system isn't selecting the best across the widest range--it's simply boosting the chances of kids born January through March.

If you're not into hockey, says Gladwell, his kicker dropping on you like a panther from a branch, note that this applies to education, too. The older kids within a class's year do better on average than the younger ones. In fact, the youngest kids are 11 percent less likely to attend college. For the crime of being young.

Then we're back to James Flynn, and his study of why Asian students as a group do better at math than Western students--up to 1.5 standard deviations better. The difference, Gladwell thinks, is attitude: Western students think math talent is innate. Either you have it or you don't. Asian students think brute persistence is key.

There's a long questionnaire associated with the TIMSS math tests--120 questions--and many students don't finish it. If you compare the kids who stick it out with the kids with the highest math scores, they are more or less the same people. (This is the kind of gap-closing anecdote that Gladwell triumphs with and makes more nuanced perspectives seem wishy-washy in comparison.)

This prompts Gladwell to repeat the theory--Gladwell is a journalist-explainer and it's important to remember that everything he says is someone else's theory--that this kind of persistence arises in rice-growing cultures. There's a Chinese proverb that the man who works from dawn to dusk 360 day a year will not go hungry, he reports; whereas he believes the English peasant side of his family would have produced something like, "The man who works from dawn to noon about 175 days a year may or may not go hungry." (This last may not have endeared him to the English.)

Contact the author of this article or email tips@seattlest.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Nice post there. Raised a few things I hadn't thought about before. Thx.
  • Ben R

    If Gladwell bothered to read some of the transracial adoption studies, or other literature on psychometric testing (Dan Seligman's book "A Question of Intelligence" would be a good start) he would see that Asian success on math can't simply be explained by culture or environmental reasons. Asian children adopted by white families mature to have IQs that are consistent with their biological peers and which are higher than their adoptive parents. [see Rushton, J.P. and Jensen, A.R. (2005). Thirty Years of Research on Race Differences in Cognitive Ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 11, No. 2, 235-294.] [also see Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.]



    "Contrary to "culture" theory, the ethnic academic gaps are almost identical for transracially adopted children, and to the extent they are different they go in the opposite direction predicted by culture theory. The gap between whites and Asians fluctuated from 19 to .09 in the NAEP data while the gap in the adoption data is from 1/3 to 3 times larger. This is consistent with the Sue and Okazaki paper above which showed that contrary to popular anecdotes, the values that lead to higher academic grades are actually found more often in white homes. In other words Asian-Americans perform highly despite their Asian home cultural environment not because of it. And though the sample is meager, I find it interesting that the gap between the black and white adopted children was virtually identical (within just 4-6 points) to the gap between whites and blacks in the general population, just like in the Scarr adoption study.





    [1] Clark, E. A., & Hanisee, J. (1982). Intellectual and adaptive

    performance of Asian children in adoptive American settings.

    Developmental Psychology, 18, 595–599.



    Frydman, M., & Lynn, R. (1989). The intelligence of Korean children

    adopted in Belgium. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1323–1325.



    Winick, M., Meyer, K. K., & Harris, R. C. (1975). Malnutrition and

    environmental enrichment by early adoption. Science, 190, 1173–1175."



    http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/004064.html



    Also, his theory about Jewish success in law overlooks that Ashkenazi Jews average highly on psychometric tests. G. Cochran, J. Hardy, H. Harpending, Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence, Journal of Biosocial Science 38 (5), pp. 659–693 (2006).



    http://homepage.mac.com/harpend/.Public/AshkenaziIQ.jbiosocsci.pdf

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@seattlest.com