Steven Johnson Gives Joseph Priestley His Propers
Sometimes book readings are news because of the book; sometimes because of the author. With Steven Johnson, you get both. He's in town for a few days on his book tour for The Invention of Air: at Elliott Bay Book Company on Sunday, at 3 p.m.; Town Hall on Monday, 7:30 p.m., and holding court at a "Words & Wine" event at the Pan Pacific Hotel on Tuesday at 6:30 p.m.
Johnson is as well known for his online associations (Wired, FEED, Plastic) as his best-selling books (Everything Bad Is Good for You, The Ghost Map), so Microsoft is having him across the lake for a talk on campus on Tuesday.
Statue of Joseph Priestley, Chamberlain Square,
Birmingham, England. 1874 by A W Williamson,
recast in bronze 1951. Photograph 6 June 2006.
Courtesy Wikipedia.
But Johnson has more in mind than rescuing Priestley from the oblivion of being a guy who discovered things we now consider so basic it's hard to imagine when we didn't know it. Alexey Pajitnov being another great example.
What makes Johnson's book fascinating is how he tracks the ecosystem of Priestley's ideas--born in the loamy economic sediment of the English class system (a precocious Priestley was foisted off an wealthy aunt and uncle so he could get a better education), given a boost by caffeine and social clubs and thrice-daily London mail, fired by competition with the French, and given a hybrid vigor in the American colonies, with their wacky political ideas. This 1.0 version of "information wants to be progressive" that Priestley and his compatriots espoused of course ran into resistance from the "we like the apple cart the way it is" crowd. At the height of his fame, Priestley was chased to America by what looked very much like peasants with torches and pitchforks.
Johnson starts by mentioning that in 2007, a presidential candidate sidestepped a question about evolution by saying he wasn't planning on writing an 8th grade science book--he was running for president. And he contrasts this with the late-in-life, reconciliatory correspondence between two actual presidents, Jefferson and Adams, in which Benjamin Franklin gets five mentions...and Joseph Priestley gets a minimum of 52. It's not just a take-down of a modern-day know-nothing, but a reminder of how deeply ingrained the belief--in the strong tie between knowledge and progress--is in our political landscape. It is, you could argue, as natural as the air we breathe.
Like Sarah Vowell, Johnson is one of a new crop of quasi-biographers who write really gripping tales about the minds of the past. It's not in opposition, necessarily, to a Great People (or Great Events) view of history, but the focus on ideas (and who is thinking and communicating them) does reconfigure the landscapes of past and present in compelling ways. More to the best-seller point, it's much less musty or inclined to trivial detail, and more immediate.


