<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Museum Of Flight Wants Retired Space Shuttle</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/12/23/museum_of_flight_wants_retired_spac.php</link>
<description>All comments for Museum Of Flight Wants Retired Space Shuttle</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_michael2</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:10:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>mvb@seattlest.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>mvb@seattlest.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>grid</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/12/23/museum_of_flight_wants_retired_spac.php#comment-1561563</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/12/23/museum_of_flight_wants_retired_spac.php#comment-1561563</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:25:27 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;er, Orbiter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>grid</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/12/23/museum_of_flight_wants_retired_spac.php#comment-1561562</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/12/23/museum_of_flight_wants_retired_spac.php#comment-1561562</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:25:08 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;but then, maybe if the Smithsonian gets one MoF would get Enterprise, the full sized aerodynamic testing model that they launched into the air off a specialized 747.

in some ways that&apos;s actually more appropriate than an actual shuttle.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>grid</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/12/23/museum_of_flight_wants_retired_spac.php#comment-1550981</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/12/23/museum_of_flight_wants_retired_spac.php#comment-1550981</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:25:33 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;As COMTE points out, two of the three are essentially spoken for.

I think that JSC in Houston has to be a favourite for the third, and if all things are equal regarding the financial commitments, I&apos;d guess the third goes to JSC over MOF.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>COMTE</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/12/23/museum_of_flight_wants_retired_spac.php#comment-1549859</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/12/23/museum_of_flight_wants_retired_spac.php#comment-1549859</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:54:48 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Of the three shuttles in active service, it looks like one has already been tapped to go to Smithsonian Air &amp; Space Museum in D.C. (which is a bummer, since they already have Enterprise at their satellite facility in Virginia), and I&apos;d be willing to bet one of the other two will end up at KSC in FL, leaving just one to go out to whichever museum can pony up in excess of $40 mm.

Boeing Air &amp; Space does have a good shot at it, IMO, what with, as you say &quot;The Big B&quot; being bother a major construction as well as operations contractor for STS, and with the added advantage of being adjacent to a runway capable of handling the modified 747 required to transport it, which is a prerequisite for acquisition. 

Plus, I&apos;m guessing Paul Allen, being the space geek he is, simply won&apos;t be able to resist the temptation to add one of these to his &quot;collection&quot;, and even in today&apos;s economy $40 mm is still pocket-change to him.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
