Quantcast

14th Strike and You're Out?

This weekend, Mount Vernon police pulled over and arrested a Skagit Valley man for his 14th DUI. Our only question--why does this guy still have his license? We're not big on removing judicial discretion from sentencing, but it would seem to this Seattlest that the DUI is one conviction where "three strikes and you're out" should apply. Three DUIs, and say goodbye to your license. Instead, since this is the man's fourth DUI arrest in under ten years, he can be charged with a felony; this seems only to punish him, rather than to protect other drivers he may come into crashing contact with when drunk behind the wheel next time around.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@seattlest.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Silverstar

    This is the problem with alcohol abusers, it screws up their judgment. It wouldn't have mattered to him if he didn't have a license. Lock him up? Maybe. Definitely think they should serve jail time after the second or third DUI.

  • bigyaz

    From the (short) story: "The documents say Bridge was also driving with a suspended license."

  • herbisara

    The article says he was driving on a suspended license.



    What I wanna know is....why the hell isn't he in jail, or being involuntarily committed to rehab so he can get some help?

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@seattlest.com