<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Will Pit Bull Attacks Boost Hands-Free Sales?</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/09/11/will_pit_bulls_boost_handsfree_sale.php</link>
<description>All comments for Will Pit Bull Attacks Boost Hands-Free Sales?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>MvB</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/09/11/will_pit_bulls_boost_handsfree_sale.php#comment-1460087</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/09/11/will_pit_bulls_boost_handsfree_sale.php#comment-1460087</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:09:51 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@jdavin: I don&apos;t think anyone&apos;s worried about under-reported non-serious bites precisely *because* they&apos;re non-serious. Pit bulls in Seattle are responsible for 22% of the bites serious enough for people to report. That&apos;s troubling, and even a pit bull advocate should take that to heart.

I don&apos;t have a dog in this hunt, really, but it seems fairly clear that when pit bulls decide to mess your shit up, they&apos;ve got the goods to do it by a fairly wide margin. (Labs came in second in Seattle: they were 18% of licensed dogs and 12% of bites.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mbq</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/09/11/will_pit_bulls_boost_handsfree_sale.php#comment-1460033</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/09/11/will_pit_bulls_boost_handsfree_sale.php#comment-1460033</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:51:20 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, and to further refute your bullshit about 95% of statistics, take a look at the CDC data here:
ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Publications/mmwr/wk/mm4621.pdf&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mbq</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/09/11/will_pit_bulls_boost_handsfree_sale.php#comment-1460028</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/09/11/will_pit_bulls_boost_handsfree_sale.php#comment-1460028</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:47:28 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Studies indicate that pit bull-type dogs were involved in approximately a third of human DBRF (i.e., dog bite related fatalities) reported during the 12-year period from 1981 through1992, and Rottweilers were responsible for about half of human DBRF reported during the 4 years from 1993 through 1996....[T]he data indicate that Rottweilers and pit bull-type dogs accounted for 67% of human DBRF in the United States between 1997 and 1998. It is extremely unlikely that they accounted for anywhere near 60% of dogs in the United States during that same period and, thus, there appears to be a breed-specific problem with fatalities.&quot; (Sacks JJ, Sinclair L, Gilchrist J, Golab GC, Lockwood R. Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998. JAVMA 2000;217:836-840.)  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jdavin</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/09/11/will_pit_bulls_boost_handsfree_sale.php#comment-1460011</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/09/11/will_pit_bulls_boost_handsfree_sale.php#comment-1460011</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:34:31 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope this doesn&apos;t become the bazillionith flamewar on this topic (go check craigslist Rants &amp; Raves if you want to see the one already going on). Just want to say keep in mind the saying that 95% of statistics are made up.  4% of dogs doing 22% of bites isn&apos;t necessarily accurate. It&apos;s likely that bites from small dogs are severely underreported, because who wants to admit they got bitten by a poodle?  Also, large dogs do more damaging bites, so those ones are more likely to be reported since it&apos;s more likely to result in a hospital visit or at least a more annoyed person. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
