<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Is Starbucks In Its Death Spiral?</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php</link>
<description>All comments for Is Starbucks In Its Death Spiral?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>TroyJMorris</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1425968</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1425968</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:46:31 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;They expanded so quickly to raise stock prices.  During a recession, expansion doesn&apos;t affect stocks, as investors are more cautious and do what they should have always done - research.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>swag</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1425804</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1425804</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:20:18 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s official. Schultz can no longer blame gas prices or the economy. Last night competitor (and, some might say, original mentor) Peet&apos;s Coffee &amp; Tea posted a 69-percent rise in profits in the second quarter:

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/08/01/ap5280510.html

Time to start swallowing some bitter medicine and stop blaming others and external forces.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Charles Redell</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1424730</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1424730</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:36:51 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Ditto Jeremy. As I&apos;ve said before, things may look bad for big Green, but this is just a phase. They may not be the best place in Seattle to get coffee, but in many places, they are and that&apos;s saying something.

Long term, these guys are a hold for sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jeremy M. Barker</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1424148</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1424148</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:56:55 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely no death-spiral involved here, sorry to say. Starbucks&apos;s greatest achievement has been penetrating espresso into mainstream American culture. Even ten years ago, their was still a &quot;snootiness&quot; associated with espresso. I remember working as a sheet metal worker during the summer before my freshman year of college, and the under-35 workers would come in with espresso and the over-35s would mock them. Now, as the McDonald&apos;s espresso ads make clear, it&apos;s the place, not the coffee, that&apos;s pretentious. So one way or another, Starbucks will successfully re-brand itself as a chain store provider of a mediocre good, a new Dunkin&apos; Donuts or the like. That&apos;s not a death spiral, that&apos;s a metamorphosis, like a butterfly emerging from a cocoon, except the beginning wasn&apos;t really all that cute, and what&apos;s coming out isn&apos;t exactly pretty either.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>bigyaz</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1424051</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1424051</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:10:48 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Starbucks obviously xpanded way too fast and too far, and now its paying for it.

But that&apos;s not unusual in the business world. So then they have to dump their non-profitable stores (or divisions, or whatever), reduce staff and move on. I think calling it a death spiral is way overblown.

Go to any big city (and their suburbs) and you&apos;ll see scores of Starbucks stores doing a booming business. If management learns from this I expect the company will do just fine.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>brad</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1423847</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/07/30/is_starbucks_in_its_death_spiral.php#comment-1423847</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:35:19 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;True dat.  All of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>