Seattlest: Because Your Commute Doesn't Cost Enough Already

TroyJMorris

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:12:38 -0800

Alright, not to be a broken record here, but some Rapid (not fucking buses) Transit Systems would probably help. Just an idea I borrowed from some major metropolitan areas. pbee - yeah, pretty accurate analysis.

pbee

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:07:44 -0800

It seems to me that most major cities have tolls for traffic entering the city's core. This is just the simplest way to pay for ongoing infrastructure maintenance (lord knows we can't manage to vote for anything to accomplish the same end). The simpler solution is, of course, to live near where you work. Work in Seattle? Live there. Work on the Eastside? Live there. Pretty easy actually. Live on the Eastside, work in Seattle and drive a 6000lb 12mpg SUV? You suck, pay up.

Yarek

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:14:38 -0800

RE: without being deterred by the cost to change your route If they are seriously considering a toll on 520 without a simultaneous toll on I-90 and some change to Lake City Way, those arteries are just going to be jammed as people avoid the toll. 405 is already a parking lot at the south end of the lake.

romulus

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:28:57 -0800

without being deterred by the cost to change your route Isn't that sort of the point of tolling? Sending people towards other directions? Figure the toll threshold is somewhere around the number of miles the next reasonable option would add to the commute times the cost of gas divided by, say, 20 (eastside workers don't exactly drive economy cars).

TroyJMorris

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:22:18 -0800

You know why we're in this issue? Because we don't have an 8-lane bridge from the get-go. And don't sit here and try to talk to me about RTS and our back and forth since the 80's about it. RTS hasn't helped any growing city... EVER.

berkun

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:56:03 -0800

> Apparently, the state believes if you have > a job on the Eastside, adding nearly $40 to > your weekly commute—plus the ever-increasing > cost of gas—is no big deal financially Point taken, but offer an alternative. There isn't one. Like most of the infrastructure problems Seattle has in 2008, there is no way around it. We have to suck it up and pay for the next few decades, in the same way the tolls paid for the 520 bridge we drive today. If you were supreme emperor of Seattle can do whatever you wanted, how exactly would you solve this problem?