Naked Swimming Is Not a Crime

At the top of the P-I today is a story about nude swimmers who like to converge on the Ballard pool for a monthly go. The crux of the story is that the Ballard pool is having a tough time finding lifeguards to stand watch during Naked Swim. We're not sure that making sure nude people don't drown is akin to selling the morning after pill. Do lifeguards really need to turn down duty simply because they don't agree with nudism? Is there a soul who wouldn't save a naked guy just because his junk is out there?
Part of the problem was that the city raised the Naked Swim lifeguard age to 21. According to the P-I:
What's the benefit of 21 instead of, say, 18, 19 or 20? Potter called it a "safety thing."If that's so, what kind of immature, irresponsible, under-21 lifeguards are they entrusting with the rest of our clothed safety? Seriously."The thinking of the management staff is that if there are any distractions at all you need a mature lifeguard on the pool deck," Potter said. "It's truly to make sure people are safe in the water."
photo by Seattlest Flickr user Dylan Koutsky
Comments [rss]
-
sarababe
-
Troy Morris
-
Malcolm Boura
-
Abbey
-
MonkeyPilot
-
Troy Morris


