Starbucks Stock Sinks, Seattlest Says Hold

mmmm StarbucksEven though some of us around the Seattlest newsroom like to beat up on little ol’ Starbucks whenever the opportunity arises, today’s news that Starbucks' stock dropped like a hockey puck of used espresso knocked out of a porta-filter didn’t put a spring in the steps of all us Seattlests.

No. Some of us actually own stock in the company (as do, we assume, some of you considering how many people in Seattle worked for the company at one time or another) and we find no cause to rejoice in Starbucks' sudden massive devaluation. It is a large share of our retirement fund.

According to The Independent of London (via Chain Leader):

Customers are continuing to desert Starbucks and the ubiquitous coffee house chain issued another profit warning last night, sending its shares plunging more than 10 per cent in after-hours trading. Its average outlet in the US is taking in around 5 per cent less in revenues than a year ago, it admitted.

The problem? In short, so far the return of Howard Schultz has yet to resemble what Steve Jobs did when he went back to Apple. Or as Seattlest Ronald put it:

Schultz--like Bush--doesn't seem to understand that he has squandered his goodwill, that no amount of fair-trade, shade-grown coffee is going to bring harmony to the espresso battlefield.

He may be right, but fear not remaining Starbucks stockholders. We’re happy to hang onto our shares--though we’re not issuing a Buy rating yet--because when you get down to it, we’re talking about a company that sells coffee all over the world. Coffee. It’s the last unregulated vice we have. People can’t get enough of this shit and say what you will about the taste of Starbucks, they’re fucking everywhere. Eventually they’ll figure their shit out and people will come flocking back to them.

So just hang in there and remember that this is a long-term investment. Heck. I remember a few years ago when another company was facing a massive defection of their customers and the devaluation of its stock. It's doing just fine now. The company? McDonald’s and they sell lattes now, too .

Look at the picture. Cool, beautiful people go to Starbucks. Don't you want to be cool and beautiful? Thanks for putting the picture in our Flickr Pool chip the photo guy!

Email This Entry


Comments (3) [rss]

I'm getting the sense that it is becoming cool to dislike Starbucks, and that attitude isn't unique to burned Sonics fans.

If that trend has any truth behind it Starbucks is in for some serious downsizing.

The only thing that will turn me against Starbucks is if they cut health care for part time baristas.

user-pic

'comon. Wide swaths of this nation still believe that Starbucks drinkers are elitist snobs and have no clue how much they are looked down upon by many.

The reason to hold on to Starbucks shares is because fellow shareholders are bound to freak out more than you, depressing the stock at a value far below what better times will reflect ahead. People make and lose their shirts in the over-corrections of the public markets, so you have to decide which side you're on.

As for serious downsizing, I still stand by my assessment that if Mr. Schultz was truly serious about making Starbucks synonymous with coffee's high-end again, he'd have to close 95% of his stores, fire the worst & least-skilled 95% of his employees, etc. No chance in hell of that ever happening.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About Seattlest

Seattlest is a website about Seattle. More

Editor: Regis Lacher Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

John Stossel has a blurb about the Dance Steps fiasco. Stossel on Dance Steps
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Seattlest.

All Our RSS