April 4, 2008
Sound Transit Unveils 60% of Design of the Capitol Hill Station
The first thing that struck us about the 3.15-mile, $1.6 billion project that is the University Link light rail line is that it will have half of the projected ridership of the 16-mile Central Link line. Kinda makes us think they should have started with the U District - Capitol Hill part first. As it is, the Central Link goes online in 2009, University Link in 2016.
We also marveled at how full the room was, for an open house on the design of the Capitol Hill station. (60% of a design is a process benchmark, meaning "over halfway there" in terms of public input and official review.) The weather was nice last night, too. No reason to be inside, even if David Hewitt of Hewitt Architects was doing a great job of PowerPoint stand-up ("Where's the reverse?").
A Sound Transit spokesperson uncomfortable with public speaking had quavered her way through a presentation on construction mitigation: that's what the vinyl "scenes" on boarded-up windows on the condemned block in question are about (closed-shop windows will get local art, too). We also learned that construction trucks will use Denny and Olive, but that's not until 2010 and we will no doubt forget that fact long before then.
The station design actually revolved around the design of three separate entrances, two larger ones (one where Twice Sold Tales fronts East John and one replacing the ex-Chang's Mongolian Grill) and a smaller one where Vivace is at Nagle Place. There are "green walls" involved (i.e., walls with greenery growing on them, like the Capitol Hill library) and a clerestory to let in natural light and shine from within at night ("like a beacon"). From outside, the entrances are fairly unobtrusive and we hope there will be attention-getting signs because, in fact, you do want people to notice where an entrance is.
We may be mistaken, but we think that Hewitt pointed out exactly one set of bike racks, at the SCCC entrance. They estimate 14,000 boardings per day at the Capitol Hill station. We're not sure room for 20 bikes is going to cut it. (The light rail cars themselves hold 200 people and two bikes.) We also imagine that by 2016, and especially between the U District and Capitol Hill, a bike-ocracy will have emerged. Planning ahead, we'd build in capacity for a few hundred bikes.
There are long tunnel/gangways from two of the entrances to the actual mezzanine of the station. We couldn't stay for the Q&A, so we didn't get to ask Hewitt if they were doing anything special for buskers. Hewitt kept mentioning lots of open space and light for security, but buskers, we feel, are the unheralded but key security device of public transit. And it'd be nice if they felt welcome and were not run over by hurrying travelers.
Down in the bowels of the station, there are huge crossbeams to keep the earth from swallowing everyone up; Hewitt spent a lot of time talking about how they'd shaped the platform space with vaulted ceilings but we can't imagine you'll really notice it. We've been in that kind of space before, and the confusing welter of beams above combined with jostling passengers more or less guarantees you don't spend a lot of time looking up to catch glimpses of innovative architecture.
That's also why we don't particularly care about the fighter-jet art supposed to hang there. Though the story of hiring a Brooklyn artist who Googled "what I love about Seattle" to get insights is provoking in its own way.



[ report this ]
I don't get why Sound Transit decided it has to level two blocks of perfectly viable businesses in the heart of the Broadway business district to build this station. In Chicago, New York, London, Paris and just about any other city with underground mass transit, the transit authorities manage to shoe-horn in transit stations without demolishing entire blocks. The gaping hole left in the Broadway commercial district as a result of this poor planning is completely unnecessary and will never heal.
[ report this ]
Sound Transit didn't start with University Link for a couple of good reasons.
First, there's no place for a maintenance base along that part of the alignment. Sound Transit would have had to do the bus tunnel retrofit anyway, and build the base in SoDo. So in "passengers per mile", you wouldn't have gotten the numbers you're suggesting.
Second, it's a very complex and expensive project, and the critical path would have been a tunnel boring operation the agency at the time had no experience with. While that's true of Beacon Hill as well, the tunnel there is a much smaller component of the overall project. Any cost overruns on Beacon Hill can be absorbed by project reserves from other parts that didn't overrun, but with U Link, we need to know better what the project will cost going in.
Given construction cost inflation at the time that the project order was selected, it wasn't known whether the taxes we voted for could pay to get to the University District at all anymore. If construction inflation kept going above 10% a year for much longer, we wouldn't have!
Given how unobtrusive metro stations are everywhere else in the world, I wouldn't be too worried about people being unable to find the Link entrances on the Hill.
On bike racks: Remember that you will be able to bring bicycles aboard Link. Why would I, as a cyclist, lock up my bike on the street when I can take it with me? It'd be taken apart for parts! That's also something that's very cheap to add more of later - there will be plenty of space in mezzanines and at surface level - but riding systems elsewhere in the world, I haven't seen many full bike racks. Not even in Paris.
I don't care either way about the art, but do note that the FTA is giving us $750 million for this project, and it's their policy that we spend 1% on art.