<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: We Review: How? How? Why? Why? Why? @ Seattle Rep</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/03/20/we_went_how_how.php</link>
<description>All comments for We Review: How? How? Why? Why? Why? @ Seattle Rep</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>James Callan</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/03/20/we_went_how_how.php#comment-1324987</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/03/20/we_went_how_how.php#comment-1324987</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:37:49 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;My wife and I caught this last night, and while I like the public radio voice more than you, the show was disappointing. Not exactly bad, but as you suggest, Kling doesn&apos;t really construct a bigger picture out of his collection of anecdotes.

It&apos;s especially notable since, as Kling fans, we saw him when he performed at ACT a few years ago (pre motorcycle accident). I&apos;d guess that a third or so of the material in How? How? appeared then. Granted, he&apos;s been busy since then (understatement of the year), but over seven years later I don&apos;t think it&apos;s asking too much for new material, or at least old material radically reworked. 

All that said, Kling&apos;s a good raconteur, and we did have a good time -- but it&apos;s hard not to notice the missed opportunities.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>