<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Remodeling History&apos;s Vision of the Future </title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/02/26/remodeling_hist.php</link>
<description>All comments for Remodeling History&apos;s Vision of the Future </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>TroyJMorris</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/02/26/remodeling_hist.php#comment-1299993</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/02/26/remodeling_hist.php#comment-1299993</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:16:37 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Man.  $150 Million for a Center that isn&apos;t being utilized properly?  And we can&apos;t get a train?  Screw this garbage.

Can we just start using this area and build up the area surrounding the Center first?  Then we can improve the center.

Right now it&apos;s an intentional destination as opposed to a more accidental destination.  What I mean by that is people come from all around to the Center for festivals, the opera or ballet.  Folks walk through it to get from Belltown to Queen Anne- but it&apos;s never really visited just to visit.  

Yes, that happens but not enough to warrant its size.  And no- improving the Center to be its own destination as opposed to occasional venue isn&apos;t going to work.  We need to develop the areas around the Center because- let&apos;s face it- people are lazy.  They won&apos;t travel far to get somewhere.

Think more Central Park and less Six Flags.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
