Quantcast

More SLUTs for City Streets

According to an article today's PI, it looks as if the city will be spending some money to study the possibility of adding more streetcars to the city's streets. The Transportation Committee passed a bill approving a feasibility study for six lines yesterday.


The study, as approved by the committee, would estimate construction costs per mile and yearly operation and maintenance costs for the six lines. Among other issues, it would identify detailed street corridors, issues with construction and utility location, how the lines would fit into Metro's bus routes, estimate the number of riders and provide ways to finance the lines, which are costlier than buses.

Predictably, some members of the Council (Licata and McIver), which will most likely give the green light to the study next week, are worried that funding new streetcars will take money away from buses. While we don't want to lose buses before there is a truly viable alternative (like light rail or a working streetcar system on grade-separated track), we also don't want our city's dependence on buses to continue any longer than it has to. If you ask us, take money from buses if it means giving us real rapid transit (we're not convinced that SLUTs are real rapid transit).

The six lines are all pretty compelling to us since they serve areas that we think need more rapid transit though the Seattle Transit Blog points out some points that need to be considered, especially on the Ballard line. They also make the point that our friend who actually works in SLU makes all the time: He never rides the thing because spending $3 to go to Whole Foods for lunch is pointless, but if the SLUT worked the U-District, he'd ride the bus to that transit hub and then ride the SLUT to work.

Two last notes: First, we know that if the city expands the use of streetcars, they won't all be SLUTs, but we couldn't resist that headline. Second, there's a video (choose the one dated 2/5/2008) of yesterday's hearing on the Seattle Channel's site that's worth watching for six minutes to see the crazy old man's testimony.

Thanks for the image of the map Seattle Transit Blog!

Contact the author of this article or email tips@seattlest.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Charles Redell

    You're all right. Streetcars are not rapid transit. I worded that poorly. I just want to see transit options other than buses and would be happy to see more streetcars. My hope is that eventually someone will have that a-ha! moment that TroyJMorris mentioned, only they'll realize they can give streetcars already running on separate tracks, right of way and control over streetlights in front of them.



    crazy idea huh?

  • It's all baby steps. After a decade of having these glorified buses running, people may think "Holy shit. What if it didn't get hit by cars once a week by having it's own track... above, below, or next to the street. I'm a genius!"



    It's just a matter of time...

  • z33bleoop

    yeah, i agree with jeremy m. barker, the slut isn't rapid transit. real rapid transit would connect seattle to north seattle or the eastside or kent, not neighborhoods just a few miles apart.



    i'd be happy to see more street cars.

  • Jeremy

    Rapid transit SLUT is not, but that should be okay, too. It's not just the damn east-siders who need rail; buses downtown stop every few blocks. There's nothing wrong with turning those into streetcars.

  • Weazul

    pfff like every other big city in the country is right by having rail. Besides who'd want to easy access from sea-tac to the U? or from the U to capital hill, or ballard, or pioneer square? Dirty smelly college students that's who! do you want them on your streets? errr trains? .... think about it.

  • jessejb

    Personally, I like the idea.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@seattlest.com