<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Safer Cycling for Seattle</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/02/04/safer_cycling_f.php</link>
<description>All comments for Safer Cycling for Seattle</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>r700</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/02/04/safer_cycling_f.php#comment-1292231</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/02/04/safer_cycling_f.php#comment-1292231</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:22:48 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That was a GREAT article.  I moved up from L.A. in August - and sold my car before I moved.  I committed to commuting by bike (and occassionally the bus) and it has been an exciting winter, needless to say.

I thought the writer really paid attention to the subtleties of the challenge that is commuting on bike in this city.

I wouldn&apos;t give it up for the world (don&apos;t ask me about it at 7 am when it&apos;s 38 degrees and raining) but the City has a long ways to go to make it a viable option for more people.  I love that the debate is even happening and this article goes a long way towards helping people understand the nuances of the challenge.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>gaijinrunner</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/02/04/safer_cycling_f.php#comment-1284521</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/02/04/safer_cycling_f.php#comment-1284521</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:10:26 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;that is really cool about the signs. 5 years ago i was riding my bike from nickerson, turning left onto fremont bridge and was hit by a car turning right. it wasn&apos;t serious, but really scary. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jared</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/02/04/safer_cycling_f.php#comment-1284437</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/02/04/safer_cycling_f.php#comment-1284437</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:51:57 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;that was a decent article.  i&apos;m glad people are starting to realize that this isn&apos;t an &quot;us vs them&quot; problem, it&apos;s an infrastructure problem, and one that can be solved to allow both modes of transportation to move freely.

i commute to work by bike from about march to november.  i pack it up for the winter because i just don&apos;t like being soggy and the darker ride times decreases visibility to a point where i&apos;m not comfortable riding.  and that reason right there is why there&apos;s so much tension between cyclists and non-cyclists: neither side respects or understands why the other chooses the transportation method they use (i&apos;m referring to the polar sides, there certainly is a level-headed middle ground for both sides).

i think because The City (government, not just it&apos;s inhabitants) are taking measures to improve safety for everyone we&apos;re closing the gap between hard-liners.  i sincerely hope that if the city keeps this up it&apos;s going to make cycling more attractive to people that currently have reservations about it.  i complain like everyone else that the Burke-Gilman gets crowded and nuts when the weather gets nice but i&apos;d much rather be stuck in a bike-jam than a car-jam :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>