Quantcast

Character Steps Aside For Blandification, Again

andysdiner.jpg
Photo by lachance

Yet another greasy Seattle landmark has fallen victim to the mass character exodus currently enveloping this city of heartless opportunists. Andy’s Diner, otherwise known as the “train car café" on Fourth Avenue South is closing.

Mozzarella sticks will be a rare commodity in Ballard with the closing of Sunset Lanes and Denny’s, and now SODO will be deprived of the Prime Steak and booze that Andy’s so graciously offered this city for over 50 years.

Supposedly one of Andy’s cars transported FDR during his 1944 reelection campaign. What is certain is that the character and back-in-time vibe of Andy’s and Sunset Lanes will be sorely missed in a city that is increasingly putting less and less value on character.

Seattlest wonders: if bland, earth-tone condos and Kinko's complexes are becoming the standard, how can the character-oozing, increasingly rare, historic landmarks not be the more precious item? Does the city council even care about preserving the character of this city or is it just a fucking yard sale at this point?

We’re sure somebody would love to build a bunch of condos right in the middle of Rome but you don’t see the Romans tearing down the fucking Coliseum just because it’s old. Andy’s Diner is to Seattle what the Coliseum is to Rome after about seven drinks and we find this gentrified blandification unsettling.

To paraphrase a Soundoffer, “Another victory for the Applebees and Olive Gardens of the world.”

Contact the author of this article or email tips@seattlest.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • MonkeyPilot

    I agree that there's no need for hyperbole. The coliseum it ain't.



    BUT, in a city founded barely 150 years old, the razing of a 50 year-old bowling alley, greasy spoon, or chain restaurant is bound to stir some emotion. Particularly when the tendency is to plant yet another indistinguishable townhouse or four in every vacant lot. After all, what will be left?



    It's a shame we don't do more to encourage re-development of existing structures and spaces, rather than tearing everything down to put up yet one more cookie cutter building.

  • pdp

    Man, I'm glad I'm not the only one to find the knee-jerk nostalgia on display in this post objectionable. Come on, Seattlest! The Andy's Diner isn't anything like the Coliseum. The latter is an awe-inspiring work of art with an astonishing history. The former serves up horrible, overpriced food in decaying surroundings. See the difference? Same with the Ballard Denny's. (Yeah, I know you were kinda kidding there, but honestly: the place deserves to go under.)



    And don't get me started with the whole notion that every time something happens in this city that y'all don't like, you react by saying that the government should Do Something About It.



    Just stop. Your personal aesthetic preferences just don't rise to the level of importance requiring the City Council to swing into immediate action.



    I realize that not everything about progress is rosy, but why must Seattleites treat every change as if it were the apocalypse?

  • romulus

    Whatever you do, don't move to the suburbs. They don't even know where their character is, much less have any.



    I don't know why Seattle condo towers are all the rage. Do people really want to pay upwards of half a million for a great view of Harbor Island? Bellevue condos should be where its at. That'd suit both Bellevue and most Seattlites just fine.

  • jwhieger

    Greasy joints are by no means popular but they are increasingly rare and have their place. Coupled with the train car aesthetic, Andy's is rare in the Seattle of 2008 if nothing else.



    There are plenty of conservative, semi-healthy budget friendly dining options in Seattle but most of them are called Subway. I can see four right now.



    I don't expect grease to become trendy but I can't sit back and watch another original piece of Seattle go without uttering some form of resistance.



    Maybe the new landowner can open a Subway in one of the train cars?

  • Wait -- it's bad to lose a Denny's because it's a victory for Applebee's?



    There's a balance that needs to be struck. Obviously, we shouldn't giddily bulldoze every building over 25 years old so that we can put up condos. At the same time, not every building that's been around for a while -- even the funky ones -- is a precious local landmark that deserves to be kept forever. That's how hoarders end up drowning in mazes of their own clutter, unable to throw out a 40-year-old grocery list because of the memories it might spark. (See: grief over the Broadway Taco Bell closing. TACO BELL!)



    If Andy's is closing because no one eats there, who's to blame for that?



    It seems to me the best efforts are compromises like might be struck with the Denny's building, and was struck with the Coliseum Theater downtown. Sure, it's a Banana Republic now, but it's got character.

  • MvB

    I have to add, for balance, that people go out to eat for more than character or local history. They go out to eat food that doesn't nauseate them.



    I ate dinner at Andy's just a few weeks ago. The experience was both expensive and repellent. I hear the weekend brunch made for a more edible greasy-spooned excursion, but I wouldn't wish that $20 rib dinner on my worst enemy.

  • I shit you not, I would put money down this is their problem:



    Nobody goes there. Yes, obviously. But I mean, nobody goes to that area of town. Nobody lives there. None of the city that would go there own cars to go there. What would help them is a closer location or... wait... what's that all other major metropolitan areas? An RTS?!



    What the fuck is that? Oh.... a choo choo train. Got it. Hahaha, you know what would be funny? A train that runs in the sky. That's crazy shit.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@seattlest.com