<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Hawks/Packers: The Three Most Important Things to Know</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/01/11/quick_and_dirty.php</link>
<description>All comments for Hawks/Packers: The Three Most Important Things to Know</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Seth</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/01/11/quick_and_dirty.php#comment-1269596</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/01/11/quick_and_dirty.php#comment-1269596</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:51:13 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I ought to have been more clear--Green Bay&apos;s nickel corners are worse than most. According to one this nerd stat called DVOA, the Packers are worst in the league at defending a team&apos;s third, fourth and fifth receivers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sabre Dude</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2008/01/11/quick_and_dirty.php#comment-1269595</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2008/01/11/quick_and_dirty.php#comment-1269595</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:46:02 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think that there&apos;s a tendency to overrate the 4 wideouts from Seattle.  Yes, they&apos;re all very good, but they&apos;ve rarely been unstoppable on the road all season.

On the other hand, Green Bay has 5 good wideouts (no superstars), plus a better tight end.  I&apos;m pretty sure that Seattle, like almost every other team in the league, gets ugly as soon as you hit the nickel corner.  From your dime corner, you just hope he doesn&apos;t fall down.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>