Tom

Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:05:25 -0800

Indeed,not! I was banking on the sheer absurdity of the statement, indeed the whole post, to dispel any possibility of such allegations. For the record further, then, there was no latent sexism in either your mother's tangy salsa or your father's creamy dip. Nor was there any latent ageism in your grandmother's delicious jelly. Nor was any sexual objectification of precious bodily fluids, or their producers, implied through any double-entendres which were not even alleged in the first place. I do admit, though, that there was a pronounced anti-avuncular bias with the savory gravy comment. For reasons completely unknown to myself --but ones by which I am complicit, as are we all-- the defamation of uncles is allowed to continue with relative impunity. Also, the potshot at Michelle Malkin was completely manifest. All spindles reserved. Void were folded and mutilated. Do not prohibit rights.

bigtimetopbanana

Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:04:20 -0800

"As if The Terrorists haven't already been winning by employing their agents, the American Indian". Comes across as latent racism, pretending to be sarcasm. I really hope that is not where you are coming from.

Seattlest: The Continuing War on Thanksgiving

Tom

bigtimetopbanana