Empathy is the issue at hand, though. Lawyer Atticus Finch (David Bishins) is an odd bird. He won't play a backyard game of catch with his son Jem. He won't join in a touch football game. When he chats with Scout, his daughter, his conversation is mainly made up of oracular pronouncements not geared for childish comprehension.He hides his countywide fame as a marksman from his kids. He takes a case that guarantees the whole family will be subject to verbal abuse and gossip. And he's always at the office -- though how busy could a small town in Alabama in 1935 keep him? -- leaving his kids mainly in the housekeeper's care.
It's in court, arguing for his client's freedom, one moment stiff and overly formal, the next his voice cracking with emotion, that he comes alive. Finch stands out in this rural Southern setting -- you can almost taste the rain-spattered red clay set -- because he won't understand that, being black, his client isn't allowed to answer back. Neighbor Maude Atkinson (Patti Cohenour) speculates that he's simply the kind of man everyone trusts to do the right thing, whether they want him to or not. (Today his insistence on ethics, formal speech, and naivety might signal someone with Asperger's.)
So there are two people who need redemption here: one is frightened, confused Tom Robinson (Sean Phillips), accused of raping a white 19-year-old girl who lives down by the dump, and the other is Atticus Finch, whom Scout (the perfectly "naturally precocious" Keaton Whittaker), wants to turn into, if not a loving father, a father she can love. The play, Christopher Sergel's adaptation of Harper Lee's novel, pares down the story to almost schematic essentials, though Fracaswell Hyman's direction could use a snap in its step. They do say life is slower down South, but the play feels longer than its over-two-hours running time.
The set design by Alec Hammond hits you when you first step in the theater -- a bare clay backyard, fronted by three ramshackle houses (the Radley residence notably askew on its foundation), a tilted phone pole, and gnarled old tree trunk that rises into a bloody-limbed, gothic horror, with red chairs lynched from its branches. We weren't sure if that represented the children's loss of innocence, or the jury's complicity -- in any event, we discovered we were the jury when the courtroom scene arrived.
Maude provides narration, to keep you on track, with the sometime assistance of town busybody Stephanie Crawford (Lori Larsen). Calpurnia (Josephine Howell) keeps the kids on track -- mostly. They're a rambunctious bunch, Jem, Scout (aka Jean Louise), and Dill (aka Charles Baker Harris), who is played by round-faced, tow-headed Lino Marioni as the miniature Truman Capote he was meant to be: by turns tiny fanciful tale-teller and insightful seer.
Bob Ewell (Russell Hodgkinson), father of a hapless, cringing Mayella Ewell (Liz Morton) had less snaky threat to him than we wanted. A bully and a batterer, he's fearsome because he's weak, angry, and ignorant. He's the kind of man kids instinctively avoid, sensing he's forever in search of weaker prey, while Hodgkinson had his best moments with a foaming-mouthed rage that recalled the rabid dog that stalks the children earlier.
At the end, the audience rose almost as one in a standing ovation. We would have stood for Keaton Whittaker; her frustration and anguish can get shouty and lead to stock hand-on-forehead poses, but more often she's alert, watchful, questioning, and it's apparent her whole being revolves around Atticus. The play's project is whether -- like Harper Lee, we imagine -- you come to love (not just respect) this man who stands so sufficient to himself that little children slip off, however hard they hug.



Another Intiman success. I really wish I had some photos of the set, it was incredible.
Guest, your demanding wish is...wait, I got that wrong. Anyway, check out the pic at the end of the review. For you, because we love our guests.
" Finch stands out in this rural Southern setting -- you can almost the rain-spattered red clay set -- because he won't understand that, being black, his client isn't allowed to answer back." (?????????????)
Guest @ 3 -- there's a word missing for one thing. It should be "almost TASTE the rain-spattered" etc. Anyway, the idea is that Finch refuses to credit ("won't understand") the South's two-track citizenship. His black client may have been falsely accused, but for a black man to contradict a white man is forbidden socially. It's a catch-22. Finch tries to argue the case as if it's between aggrieved equals, but it's not. Contrast that with (just for instance) a more pragmatic lawyer who might have played to the jury's bigotry and yet done better for his client.
hey keats its alli and claire love ya well see ya later and we miss you hope your having loads of FUN but why wouldnt you bye XOXOXOXOXOXO