Quantcast

Seattle's Mall-ternative Newsweeklies

window2.jpgA couple years back, before we'd been thoroughly disabused of the notion that a future existed in pecking out stories for a living, we were in talks with a local fashion boutique that was seeking freelancers. They needed local writers to churn out a couple stories on hip clothes and NW lifestyle (or something to that effect -- honestly, we don't remember) for an ad supplement they planned to publish in Seattle's "underground newspaper," the Stranger.

We remember screwing up our face in righteous disgust at that appellation, but kudos to Tim Keck & Co.: almost 20 years after Keck -- then a student at University of Wisconsin-Madison -- sold his share of The Onion to move to Seattle and start his own alt-weekly, the Stranger still manages to convince enough people it's "underground" that a boutique store will cough up $2,000+ per four-color page to publish an ad supplement to bask in the perceived indie cred.

The alternative newsweekly, though, is a beast in search of direction. Mark Fitzgerald, the editor-at-large for the industry journal Editor & Publisher recently weighed in on the floundering alt-weekly market, noting, "As the oldest of them push past 40, alternative newspapers are still trying to figure out what they're going to be when they grow up."

"As we researched this month's cover story," writes Fitzgerald (the cover story on alt-weeklies is subscriber-only):

...my colleague Jennifer Saba and I were reminded there's a class war going on in the alternative press. Alternative papers are moving in several different directions -- and they all have something snide to say about where the other guy is going. This is an intramural contest among papers that consider themselves the "real" alternatives, not those free papers created by mainstream dailies they dismiss as "faux alternatives."

True enough. the Stranger has spilled no shortage of ink bashing the hell out of the Weekly, which has been in what seems steady decline. the Stranger was rapidly approaching their circulation when SW's parent company, Village Voice Media, was purchased by the New Times Co. As the Stranger delighted in reporting, New Times -- which owned around a dozen weeklies around the country -- was a conservative corporate affair. Their papers lacked a lot of local color and instead were meant to appeal to travelers, who need to know exactly where to go to find local hooker listings.

New Times purged the Weekly of long-time staffers and replaced them with fresh faces who seemed to know for shit about Seattle. True, we all find the "Ask an Uptight Seattleite" column to be apt, if rather uninspired. But for all the Weekly's new-found willingness to bash the locals, their attempt to re-establish a reader-base has hit no shortage of snags.

Newly-former staff writer Huan Hsu initiated a seeming race to the bottom. Back in April he started the trend by attacking Real Change's newspaper vendors for not being homeless. But it was sex--the nastier and raunchier the better -- that did him in. On May 16 he wrote an article about dirty-dancing high schoolers. On June 13 was the now-infamous story about a Ballard High School tennis coach and his pseudo-spiritual sexuality, shared with his teenage female wards. Despite the grotesque pun in the title ("Break Point: Ballard High School's New Age Tennis Coach and the Bad News Beavers"), the article led to the coach's dismissal and seemed to vindicate the teen girl navel gazing. On July 11, Hsu wrote a pseudo-environmental piece about new-agey sex-toy sellers protesting phthalates in dildos. Then there was the July 25 attempt at muckraking that recounted wacky, disgusting and lewd stories of Metro Transit buses. But the final nail in Hsu's coffin was the bottom-of-the-barrel Aug. 8 cover story about NW "cougars." Since that story appeared, Hsu has disappeared from the Weekly's masthead.

the Stranger didn't quite seem to know how to spin the story. On Aug. 8, news editor Josh Feit posted a brief announcement on the Slog stating simply that, "Seattle Weekly staff writer Huan Hsu (rhymes with "who?") has left the paper after a brief 5-month stint." No doubt Stranger staffers would have loved to make an issue of Hsu's dismissal [Note: It has come to our attention since this post was published that it was inaccurate and misleading to characterize Mr. Hsu's leaving the Weekly as a "dismissal"; by all accounts he left of his own volition to pursue writing a book. We regret the error. Furthermore, as has been suggested by both outside commenters and other Seattlest contributors, it is potentially unfair to hold Mr. Hsu solely accountable for the subject of his articles, as the editors of Seattle Weekly played an unknown but no doubt decisive decision-making role in the process.] following the story, but they're hardly in a position to talk: their editor Dan Savage made his name as the louche sex columnist behind "Savage Love." the Stranger postures as radical, but its success lies in its status as the go-to source for upscale urbanites -- hipster and yuppie alike -- with their cherished disposable income (hence the fashion boutique paying outrageous ad rates). On the whole, the quality of their writing seems to have plateaued. Since Sandeep Kaushik -- their excellent former political reporter -- left to serve as a spokesperson for King County Executive Ron Sims, the Stranger has struggled to maintain quality. Charles Mudede, growing international reputation notwithstanding, remains hit and miss at best. Half of his articles are incomprehensible or pointless (why exactly did the Stranger need a half-baked obit/101-course on Jacques Derrida?) while the other half remain almost unbearably pretentious. While Arts Editor Christopher Frizelle remains an accomplished writer, he doesn't seem to bother with it much, which is probably why he's earned the enmity of a number of artists in Seattle by taking the Stranger's hipper-than-thou attitude to new heights. We don't condone bowing to the pressure of fetishizing the local, but when you're being snubbed by a man wearing an ugly second-hand tie with an untucked button-down and a jauntily angled cap, you could perhaps be forgiven for assuming that an arts editor's job should require serious engagement with the arts rather than being a behind-the-curve hipster genuflecting at the increasingly irrelevant altar of Dave Eggers and the McSweeney's crowd.

Radical chic pretensions aside, the Stranger well represents its demographic, which is not nearly as flattering a political position as they might expect. Yes, they do a great job of covering gay issues, and even have the occasional article by iconic gay conservative Andrew Sullivan. But these days that's not particularly radical. As Sullivan himself wrote in a good piece in The New Republic a couple years back:

For the better part of two decades, I have spent much of every summer in the small resort of Provincetown, at the tip of Cape Cod. It has long attracted artists, writers, the offbeat, and the bohemian; and, for many years now, it has been to gay America what Oak Bluffs in Martha's Vineyard is to black America: a place where a separate identity essentially defines a separate place. No one bats an eye if two men walk down the street holding hands, or if a lesbian couple pecks each other on the cheek, or if a drag queen dressed as Cher careens down the main strip on a motor scooter. It's a place, in that respect, that is sui generis. Except that it isn't anymore. As gay America has changed, so, too, has Provincetown. In a microcosm of what is happening across this country, its culture is changing.

Some of these changes are obvious. A real-estate boom has made Provincetown far more expensive than it ever was, slowly excluding poorer and younger visitors and residents. Where, once, gayness trumped class, now the reverse is true. Beautiful, renovated houses are slowly outnumbering beach shacks, once crammed with twenty-something, hand-to-mouth misfits or artists. The role of lesbians in the town's civic and cultural life has grown dramatically, as it has in the broader gay world. The faces of people dying from or struggling with aids have dwindled to an unlucky few. The number of children of gay couples has soared, and, some weeks, strollers clog the sidewalks. Bar life is not nearly as central to socializing as it once was. Men and women gather on the beach, drink coffee on the front porch of a store, or meet at the Film Festival or Spiritus Pizza.

As the gay community becomes more diverse, and potentially more conservative, it's impossible not to ask how far the editors of the Stranger will follow them to the right. It's not as simple as Dems vs. Republicans; it's a question of political values. In the devastating wake of the 2004 Presidential election, the Stranger published its famous "Urban Archipelago" cover, which in stark terms laid out an us-and-them world-view that celebrated cities as progressive and dynamic centers of culture and the economy, while deriding the conservative rural and ex-urban areas as backwards, regressive, socially conservative and essentially populated by ignorants. A salve for wounded pride, perhaps, but as far as progressive politics go, it's anything but: as Thomas Frank has argued, the logic behind this sort of argument is regressive and reactionary and not nearly as liberal and progressive as its advocates like to think.

There's an argument that would hold that the Stranger has no obligation to follow someone like Frank's logic, which argues for inclusiveness and alliances of common interest between the working class Red State voters and white collar urban liberals. the Stranger, after all, is a local newspaper. But its editors fancy themselves national actors. Witness Dan Savage's recent literary output, including such raunchy titles as The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family.

Don't get us wrong -- the stories of gay parents like Savage are increasingly part of our culture and they need to be told. We just don't think you can have it both ways; there's a natural age limit to hipness, and parenthood remains the antidote to hipness, despite the pathetic attempts of writers like Neal Pollack to deconstruct the paradigm. It's not radical, in other words, to desperately drag your hipness through all your life changes; it's juvenile and sophomoric. There's nothing quite as sad as a poorly aging hipster, and that means the Stranger either needs to grow up (and risk going down the same road the Weekly did with its gradual slide into irrelevance during the Village Voice Media years), or Keck needs to skip that phase entirely, ax half his staff and bring in a new crowd of crazy young radicals to reinvigorate the paper.

E&P's Fitzgerald could have been referring specifically to Seattle when he wrote:

Like many another baby boomer watching his belly spill over the waistband of his Relaxed Fit 550 Levi's, part of the alternative press despairs that its g-g-generation has lost its fire and become exactly the complacent middle-class American booboisie it loathed. Meanwhile, another, and growing, part of the alt-press scorns those one-time pioneers as nostalgia-befogged, aged hippies who squandered their youth on empty indulgence when they should have been fully funding their IRAs and celebrating their final mortgage payments with appletinis.
The flip-side is also true: the aging Baby Boomers have good reason to sneer down at the poorly aging hipsters trying to find a balance between bong hits and parenthood, and lash out at the hypocrisy and intellectual confusion of high-end consumer papers posing as indie rags taking on the man. Then again, maybe the entire problem is us, the readers: why is it that we fall for the "alternative" posturing of free weekly newspapers owned by rich people (Keck) or huge corporations (New Times), that make bank by printing 60%-70% ad-based rags for business travelers in need of cocktails and a cheap trick?

Image: "Window to 2004" by Grundlepuck, from the Seattlest Flickr pool.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@seattlest.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • seandr

    Very interesting post, Jeremy, sorry to have seen it so late. Brave of you to fight the power. As The Stranger continues to gain mass, who knows, maybe it will one day implode.



    On the following point, however, I think you are dead wrong:



    "There's nothing quite as sad as a poorly aging hipster, and that means the Stranger either needs to grow up... Keck needs to ... ax half his staff and bring in a new crowd of crazy young radicals to reinvigorate the paper"



    This is bullshit. No one handed the hipster crown to The Stranger back in the 90s. They just took it. So did The Onion, The Village Voice, and McSweeney's.



    Assuming you are in your twenties, I can understand your frustration. Frankly, as a 30-something hipster, I find it quite disturbing that the youngsters have not claimed cool for themselves. Young should be cooler than old - this is just the natural order. But from what I've seen, hip is dead among the twenty somethings in Seattle. Most youngsters are yuppies, aspiring yuppies, or losers who are bitter and angry because they'll never be yuppies, and the coolest people around are all pushing 40.



    Please, one of you, start a cool alternative weekly already.



    And please don't remove this comment because it contains a few colorful words. That's not hip.

  • Cato the Younger Younger

    @15. I totally agree. The Stranger lost a lot of credibility with me when that was posted AND it is still on line. (Any editor with any morality would have pulled it by now)



    So Seattlest, we all know the Stranger has gone mainstream, are you going to fill in the gap as Seattle's ONLY newspaper?

  • Katelyn

    The Slog post with your query letter was completely yucky and underhanded. However, it did alert me to the existence of this article. And now, Seattlest is officially bookmarked! Score one for disillusionment.



    Now, Seattlest, if you can turn into a fierce and important city blog, I'll love you forever. I'll be checking in to see the progress.

  • Gomez

    There's a lot more truth to this article than Stranger fans want to admit. I've been a Stranger supporter long after my friends turned their back on the paper, and at this point, even I have to call their journalistic credibility and quality into question. This article says a whole hell of a lot, and pulling a quasi-damning query letter out of Frizzelle's desk drawer doesn't change that.



    You can bag on the blogs and the Seattle Weekly for so long, but if your own paper's quality begins to suffer, you begin to become a parody of yourself every time you do so.

  • sciencevsromance

    f.w.i.w., I e-mailed the managing editor of the Weekly to ask about Hsu's departure from the paper. He replied said that "[Hsu] left amicably to move to Shanghai to work on a long-awaited book project that has to do with his 96-year-old grandmother in China."



    [mb]





  • guest

    What really constitutes a race to the bottom? Hsu's stories were obviously well read if they generated such strong emotions in the community. Isn't that the whole point of an alt-weekly, or for that matter, any publication? Specifically, why is a story about high school administrators setting dirty dancing rules a race to the bottom? Why is a story about the people who sell Real Change (homeless or not) a race to the bottom? If Hsu wrote about puppy toys laced with phthalates, would that be a race to the bottom?



    Implying that Hsu was fired (besides being a low blow) doesn't pass any sniff test. Clearly the editorial staff at the Weekly didn't have any problems with his articles, otherwise they wouldn't have run them (or at least not made them lengthy cover stories).



    Anyways, what really deserves investigation is why the Weekly and the Stranger feel the need to snipe at each other. In reality, both are pretty good alt-weeklies, but they sound like petulant teenagers when they nitpick on their respective blogs. Just shut up and focus on the product... that's what will earn more readers.

  • MvB

    I think it's unfair to Hsu to imply (if I'm reading this correctly) that he personally was on a race to the bottom. The newbie on staff that he was, I'm reasonably certain he was assigned those stories to cover -- if there's a race to the bottom, the starting line is in the Weekly's editors' offices. I believe he left under his own steam, and after that "cougars" article, I don't blame him.

  • guest

    As a Jew, I am insulted when anyone criticizes The Stranger. When I moved here four years ago from Williamsburg, The Stranger was a breath of fresh air in this too white town.



    People who don't like The Stranger are really just anti-semitic. The Stranger covers Jewish issues better than any other Seattle paper.

  • Cato the Younger Younger

    Eh, commenting about the Stranger is always fun. But I do not take the Stranger all that seriously since some of the political commentary has been either right on point or catastrophic. I do agree that Christopher is not the most volumous writer the Stranger has but most of the time he shows talent and at times brilliance. Dan Savage is great as long as he stays with the issues he is passionate about like Gay marriage or the hypocracy of much of Christianity. Once he moves away from that though he sounds shrill, angry and often times wrong (his support of the Iraq war stands out). And Josh awhile back did not even know who Greg Palast was, a sin for a publication that claims to be "alternative".



    Simply put, the weekly rags in Seattle seem to be more like talk radio than anything else. Lots of ranting through an egostical framework. Always quick to take credit when they can and avoid responsibility when they are wrong. Take the Stranger and Seattle Weekly with a grain of salt.

  • guest

    So what exactly should the Stranger do - fire everyone and chase after a bunch of young conservative types willing to challenge the status quo?



    Funny, I thought that's exactly what the New Times-owned Seattle Weekly tried - and failed - to do.



    As anyone who's followed state and local politics knows, the Stranger remains a radical force. Who else championed a surface/transit option? Who else called out the Washington State Supreme Court on their dishonest gay marriage ruling? It would be great if the day came when the Stranger was no longer radical, when progressive politics were the norm.



    But we're not there yet. Asking for more conservatives is so 2003.



    -a random Seattleite with no ties to the Stranger (but who does know Seattlest Tom).

  • Spot on if you ask me. The Stranger staff has always been in an ivory tower above Capitol Hill lording themselves over the teeming masses of hipsters (and hipster wannabes) and somehow selling themselves as ahead of the hipster curve (while hanging out in the Cha-Cha Lounge long after everyone else had moved on).



    I would hope that someday, people will wake up and smell the coffee, and realize that they can find what The Stranger does, done better in numerous other places around the Web and kill that poor rag.

  • guest

    Making fun of a man's tie is bullshit. Especially when they're second-hand.

  • Jeremy

    I hear tell that there's an error in the above article--there was no official word from Seattle Weekly that Huan Hsu was dismissed. I regret the choice of word (but not the assertion he was on a race to the bottom).

  • Seth

    I was just talking about this very topic this weekend somewhere, with someone. The Stranger is getting older, and its concerns have changed with its age. I mean, as a kid I picked it up for much-needed advice about sex and TV, now I'm much more likely to read it for trenchant commentary on progressive politics, good writing, or an update about the status of our city's bicycling laws. These were not worries of mine as a desperately horny teenager harboring an unhealthy fixation on Ren & Stimpy.



    There's been a change. The Weekly's audience aged, and the new Weekly sort-of deserted them--I'm not sure who the Weekly's audience is now.



    But, just like the Stranger challenged the Weekly, eventually--maybe ten years from now? less? some young upstarts will make the Stranger the butt of their fogey jokes.

  • guest

    Let's see now. The Seattlest is a who-cares blog of dubious lineage. A local (sic) version of a national syndicate of web sites.



    Now they're passing judgement on The Stranger. Because...? You're so great? Right.



    Catty backstabbing wasn't hip in junior high and it sure isn't flattering past one's 20s. (You are over 20 aren't you?). If you have something of merit to say, state your point. Snarky don't cut it. Especially when you write as poorly as you do with so few "facts" presented.



    Your punishment: writing "I won't be a little bitch any more. I promise." on the blackboard 100 times. Quick before someone drops a house on you!



    JetCityOrange

  • kasa

    Mr. Barker sir, I'd like to buy a drink! Followed by a toast with a hearty "hear, hear!"

  • sciencevsromance

    Call me crazy for picking it up every so often, but I think that the Seattle Weekly is much more interesting today than it was two years ago.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@seattlest.com