Quantcast

Intiman's Prayer for My Enemy: Better Than Cats?

PrayerEnemy03.jpgAt Seattlest, the commenter is king, partly because we get away with writing less when we quote! So here's this thumbnail review of Prayer for My Enemy: "It manages to address some very serious topics (acted out extremely well) and then another second switch to being really light-hearted." You are correct, commenter!

It's a profane, messy, wild-hearted reveille about Right Now, gleefully mashing the personal up with the political. The play snagged us from the start, seconds in. John McDermott's minimal set (sneakily, all about projecting into the audience) aside, the larger setting is the Intiman if your life, not Art, had smuggled itself inside.

The thing is, playwright Craig Lucas and director Bart Sher are crazy people and they decided it would be all right if they gave Seattle first look at a play that features two hilariously foul-mouthed, drug-friendly 20-something guys, Billy (Daniel Zaitchik) and Tad (James McMenamin), who used to be best friends in school -- but who kinda grew apart after they, you know, made out with each other, CLEARLY! only as preparation for when they'd find a chick to score with -- and who, as the play starts, run into each other again at a gas station. In other words, two guys, more or less, who can be found any night of the week on Broadway.

Being a cum laude graduate of the Kevin Smith School of Diction is one thing, but Lucas takes that hardened, heart-poor speech and squishes it up against squirmingly frank interior monologues that come right in the flow of conversation so that you're not always sure if someone is finally saying what's on their mind and if this is the big dramatic moment. Which is a good, alert place for an audience to be.

Lucas appreciates the very real sense of dread and futility balancing the fun of a fiery, truth-telling speech. He strips away the rationales for speaking and for not speaking, and says that while silence can make us sick and pride makes us shout, there's a quieter way of talking, where we ask for what's in someone else's best interests. If the play is funny -- and it is, like when a firecracker goes off in someone else's hand -- it's funnier because it's saying that stuff we leave unsaid. (Regular people "we," not Seattlest we.)

At the gas station, Billy mentions he's about to ship off to Iraq, and invites Tad to drop in at his going-away party with his family: his bipolar, AA-going dad Austin (John Procaccino, in a gloriously ragged, outsized performance), mom Karen (Cynthia Lauren Tewes, giving off fumes of bovine anxiety), sister Marianne, the comparatively speaking "level-headed" one (Chelsey Rives, catching just the right "she's her father's daughter" notes).

Lucas could make some easy points off this family, off "Bipolar Dad" and "Homemaker Mom," off Iraq, off gay/straight, but he doesn't because family -- especially dysfunctional family -- can tell us a lot about ourselves: who we are, who we want to be, and who we're scared of being.

In a separate story, there's the compassionate-but-cranky Dolores (Kimberly King, playing a sweet quiet-home-seeking-missile of menopausal age), who seems dragooned from the streets of Kirkland with her tirades about hating to go into the city and the beauties of relaxed, upper middle-class rustic life. What ties her to the rest of the characters turns out not to be as plausible as her simple being is. (It's a forgivable misstep, and not for standing out as plot or metaphor; we just weren't made aware that what we saw earlier was one of Chekhov's loaded guns.)

Prayer For My Enemy runs through August 26 at the Intiman. Tickets range from $10 (25 and under) to $48.

Photo Chris Bennion © 2007 – From left: Cynthia Lauren Tewes (Karen), John Procaccino (Austin), James McMenamin (Tad) and Daniel Zaitchik (Billy) in Prayer for My Enemy.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@seattlest.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • MvB

    Guest @1: I actually toned down my excitement about this play, so your response is -- how to put this -- wrong. I don't imagine I'll change your mind, but here are a few thoughts in response to your thoughts.



    1) Why gay? -- What an odd question. You know, I've never once sat through a play and wondered, "Again? Why are all these people straight?!" In any event, bisexual would be a better descriptor of Billy, at least.



    2) Seeing God -- I thought this was product of a PTSD/manic episode that Austin experienced and helped him understand his bipolar father better. The subsequent downplaying struck me as perfectly plausible, given everyone's WTF? response.



    3) Autistic son -- Yeah, this was clumsy, and apparently largely written out of the play at this point. The program said there was an actor playing the kid, but he never appeared.



    4) Rolling on E -- the point seemed to me that this is one of the few ways that people uncensor themselves, while on drugs (and it's related to the pot-bonding scene earlier). When Billy starts saying how much he loves everyone, it freaks the family out.



    I didn't find the family wildly dysfunctional -- and I didn't find much unrealistic (i.e., not supported by the play's reality) besides the road rage scene. Judging from your comments, it seems like the problems you had with the play were problems you might have with people who don't examine the past and don't bother to predict the future. But this play is supposed to be about Americans, so what can you do.

  • guest

    Too bad the play was so ham fistedly over the top and of no consequence that any good was outshadowed by the bad.



    Theres more than a few places where Lucas opens pandora's box but doesn't even delve into it later.



    Gay Relationship

    Seeing God

    Autistic Son

    Son in Law on E

    ...



    These are the biggest parts of the play that had no resolution or even something that had a long term consequence involved. All of them were short term plot devices of conveinence, not of some deeper fabric.



    Gay Relationship: The son Austin motivated to join the army by his father's abuse. His lover marries his sister. They don't do anything about the past, present, or future. So really it could have been anything. Why gay? Cause it's vogue and shocking?



    Seeing God:

    Lucas opened Pandora's Box and didn't even have the balls to follow it up later except for a few lines. You think that one having a life changing experience like THAT would then be able to face the aformentioned gay relationship. But he didn't and it's just a lazy way of trying to unwind something that he half assed wound up in the first place.



    Autistic Son:

    Ooh she had an autistic son. That's so saaaaaaaad. It's so "so what?" This child is convienently wheeled off to a home for children with problems, and the entire vehicle is then meaningless.



    Son in Law on Ecstacy:

    What was the point of this scene? That he really has a soft spot in his heart for the old bastard? While on Ecstacy? The grandfather of his baby?



    The family was more than dysfunctional. It was completely without memory and foresight. It was a family that did things for the sake of being ridiculous and unrealistic. There was nary a moment where the family was convincing in their relationship to one another.



    This play was to Death of A Salesman as Cat People was to Cats.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@seattlest.com