Does Anyone Actually Like the Downtown Library?
Well-known alterna-librarian Jessamyn West came to town recently, and finally had a chance to check out our flagship library. Her verdict?
I saw a real disconnect beween the lovely outside and grand entry spaces to the library, plus a few other very design-y areas, and the rest of the building. Materials were hard to find. VERY hard to find. Signage was abysmal, often just laserprinted pieces of paper, sometimes laminated and sometimes not. Doors to areas that may have been public were forbidding and unwelcoming. There weren’t enough elevators. There weren’t enough bathrooms. There wasn’t a comfortable place to sit in the entire building. There were lots of “dead spaces” that, because of architecture, couldn’t really be used for anything and they were collecting dust. The lighting was bad. Stack areas were dim and narrow. The teen area seemed like an afterthought. Bizarre display areas with a table and some books on it were in the middle of vast open areas. Most of the place felt like it was too big and then the stacks felt too crowded and I had to climb around people working to find things. Shelvers shut down the entire “spiral” concept with booktrucks. The writer’s area in this library is a shadow of the glorious writers room in the old downtown building where I had a desk briefly.Ouch. Of course, these criticisms aren't new. Maybe we agree as a city that our Koolhaas building is way cooler than our Gehry building, but maybe we're all starting to agree that the bar shouldn't be set quite that low.
West's post includes a link to a review of the library by another recent visitor, Phoenix librarian Joe Schallan, who shares a great story:
I chatted for some time with a volunteer posted in the living room. I explained that Linda and I were librarians on vacation from Arizona, and she said they get a lot of librarians on vacation. While she was extolling the building to me, a twentyish young man came up and interrupted us. He loudly said "This building is anti-life . . . I HATE this building!"The library may be America's 108th most favorite architectural work, but the chorus of discontent only seems to get louder. (Maybe this is what happens when process doesn't get to ruminate over an idea long enough.)The volunteer smiled sweetly and said to me that the building certainly elicits all kinds of strong reactions.
We still like it -- it looks gorgeous, inside and out -- but it's not nearly as usable as hoped for. Herbert Muschamp's description of it as a "big rock candy mountain of a building" seems especially apt: lovely to look at, sweet for a few minutes, but too much rock candy isn't all that good for you. You can't live off the stuff.
Does anyone still love this building? Not just like despite its flaws, or think is an improvement over what was there, but love it?
Former resident (and former quiz host -- represent!) West concludes her piece with an explanation of why she left Seattle: "its idea of progress and mine were fundamentally at odds and I didn’t enjoy the destabilizing effect of a city always under construction and didn’t get enough from the things that were eventually constructed."
Photo: Seattle Public Library, by inzenity, from our pool. Thanks!
Comments [rss]
-
guest
-
guest
-
guest
-
guest
-
guest
-
guest
-
guest
-
guest
-
guest
-
Courtney
-
guest
-
Troy Morris
-
guest
-
Jeremy
-
James Callan
-
guest
-
Tom
-
guest
-
guest
-
guest


