<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Christ Van Dyk Endorses Saving Our Sonics</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/07/25/sour_s.php</link>
<description>All comments for Christ Van Dyk Endorses Saving Our Sonics</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/07/25/sour_s.php#comment-1156321</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/07/25/sour_s.php#comment-1156321</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:31:36 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The Key hasn&apos;t regularly made enough money on the Sonics to retire significant debt.  Chris Van Dyk is more interested in keeping his name in the paper than saving the Sonics or money.  If they&apos;re going to end up leaving anyway, the city would be a lot smarter to accept a hefty buyout which it could use to retire debt than to drag this through the courts and make piddly for the next three years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>