<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Water, Unbottled</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/07/09/theres_a_kind_o.php</link>
<description>All comments for Water, Unbottled</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Tom</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/07/09/theres_a_kind_o.php#comment-1143142</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/07/09/theres_a_kind_o.php#comment-1143142</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:46:04 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Dan! This post was great food for thought today (and link to a truly excellent article). Not to toot my own horn but your post got me to thinking so much about this issue that I posted some of my own cogitations on my (pseudo)academic blog:

http://www.urbanarchives.org/wordpress/2007/07/10/a-bottle-of-place/&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>tvargs</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/07/09/theres_a_kind_o.php#comment-1143079</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/07/09/theres_a_kind_o.php#comment-1143079</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:04:02 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is Chris Anderson&apos;s comment informational or just plain old spam? Regardless, Seattle water is really quite clean. And James, it may be your pipes more than South Seattle itself tainting your water. Or it could be South Seattle - I recall viciously avoiding the water fountain at Garfield High for the same &quot;poor taste&quot; reason. Oh and because I think Rick may have peed in one, once.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/07/09/theres_a_kind_o.php#comment-1142993</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/07/09/theres_a_kind_o.php#comment-1142993</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:42:21 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent Story!
Here are some valuable drinking water filtration
resources you can use in the future.

Solid carbon block technology is considered the most effective method
for reducing contaminants of health concern. In addition to the
removal of cysts, a solid carbon block filter also reduces:
· chemicals; MTBE, TCE
· pesticides;
· herbicides;
· disinfections byproducts;
· heavy metals;
· cysts; Crypto bug
· asbestos
· particulates
· chlorine.
. Arsenic
The filter is (changed) once a year!

This is Chris Anderson,
I have been educating consumers &amp; others in the drinking water field
for over 13 years.
How do you choose a water filter? What does the filter actually reduce
or remove? And finally what does it cost? These answers are found by
doing a little research or home work will call it. Doing such will
save you a lot of money and provide you with pure &quot;healthy&quot; drinking
water. The bottom line is you must get a Data Performance Sheet by the
NSF national sanitation foundation to compare filters. These &quot;proof of
performance&quot; sheets show exactly what the filter does and for how many
gallons. If you can&apos;t get one from the manufacturer or from who ever
is trying to sell you one, simply say no thanks!

Do your home work! Make a good choice for your drinking water needs.
Visit NSF below:
http://www.nsf.org/consumer/drinking_water/dw_treatment.asp?program=WaterTre

Note: NSF has tested &amp; certified over 4000 different filters. It&apos;s
important to understand we have 400 plus manufacturers of water
filters alone world wide. Having said this &quot;why&quot; would you purchase a
water filter that is NOT tested &amp; certified by NSF. It all comes down
to this: Talk is cheap and facts are hard to find in the drinking
water filtration industry! NSF is were you will get the facts.

Ultimately it comes down to this: What does the filter do &amp; how much
does it cost?
If you are paying more than 8 cents a gallon or $5 a month, your paying too much.

The direct link to view products, prices and gather more information is here.

www.multipureusa.com/canderson

Ps. Should you have any questions in the drinking water field, please write.
waterfilters@gmail.com
Thank you for your time and consideration,
Chris Anderson Independent Distributor of Multipure Drinking Water
Systems #223193&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>James Callan</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/07/09/theres_a_kind_o.php#comment-1142942</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/07/09/theres_a_kind_o.php#comment-1142942</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:50:12 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we live in Rainier Beach, our Brita filter is a necessity -- the tapwater (at least in our house) is gross. In Wallingford and Wedgwood, though, it was fine.

Brita takes care of the south Seattle flavor, though, so we only have a case of bottled water on hand for emergencies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>