<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: A Writer&apos;s Work is Never Done</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php</link>
<description>All comments for A Writer&apos;s Work is Never Done</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Seth</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1102459</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1102459</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:37:07 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;fearless writer&quot; goes down in history with &quot;brilliantly imagined&quot; and &quot;the novel only X could write&quot; as completely meaningless book review phrases.

There are fearful writers somewhere? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Dan</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1102435</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1102435</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:03:14 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Pauls, I doubt it, and now my guess that he finds obscure reviews of himself via Google is blown out of the water: I just bought this book and one of the blurbs on the back is &quot;A absolutely fearless writer&quot; from the Rocky Mountain News--the same newspaper that printed the &quot;Unfortunately, Flight is disappointing, and the signs are that the publisher knew it - why else would a novel by such a major writer be brought out as a paperback original?&quot; review, although the quotes seem to be from different pieces.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Pauls</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1102245</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1102245</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 11:27:43 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;A brilliant strategy. Maybe Sherman Alexie reads Seattlest?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jon</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1100838</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1100838</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:51:05 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Finally getting around to reading &quot;Ten Little Indians,&quot; but I must say that that Ridnour piece was the shiznit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jeremy M. Barker</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1096683</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1096683</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:45:09 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Black Cat is a trade paper original imprint of Grove/Atlantic that they intend to load up with radical, controversial and experimental lit. I actually find Alexie a tiresome bore of a read, but the reviewer doesn&apos;t know her American literary history. Grove/Atlantic relaunched the Black Cat imprint because in the 1960s it published such nobodies as Kerouac, Brecht, Samuel Beckett, Eugene Ionesco, etc., etc., etc. I don&apos;t know for certain, but my guess is Grove/Atlantic is pushing some of their known commodities into Black Cat to raise its profile. The book sections (what few are left) still resist reviews of paperback originals. But Alexie&apos;s status helps ensure a review, and by extension helps break down that wall and increase the likelihood that other Black Cat books get published. 

There was actually a pretty cool fold out chart of Black Cat/Grove&apos;s history in the Believer a while back, but it&apos;s no on their website.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>MvB</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1096637</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/05/17/a_writers_work_is_never_done.php#comment-1096637</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 14:50:42 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe it was because it was so local. It&apos;s a great piece -- it&apos;s persuasive as hell. Go Sherman!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
