Quantcast

Seattlest Book Club: Red Weather

This month we subject Pauls Toutonghi’s young adult novel Red Weather to the awesome critical power that is Seattlest. The book has nothing to do with Seattle, but Toutonghi allegedly spent some formative years here and he’s old friends with our most frequent contributor, so what the hell? We’re trying out a new “point/counterpoint” format, with contributors Matt Silvie and James Callan facing off.

Matt Silvie:

Toutonghi does a good job of capturing the tedious self-involvement and exaggerated sense of anxiety of the archetypal teenager in the voice of his main character, 15-going-on-16-year-old Yuri Balodis, who provides the first person narration for a series of superfluously detailed events involving his Latvian immigrant family in urban Milwaukee in the fall/winter of 1989-1990. Toutonghi grounds his novel very specifically with world history by making chapter titles out of the specific dates that correspond to landmark moments in the fall of the Soviet Union, which appear on Yuri’s TV and in the eye witness accounts of his visiting relatives. Yuri tells his story with a level of emotion, urgency, immaturity and excessive focus on incidental details that suggest a direct proximity of a young storyteller to his recently experienced life.

Irritatingly, this turns out not to be the case, as Toutonghi somewhat sloppily reveals. On page 73, a presumably teenage Yuri groans:

“Dr. Graham described his Thursday night reading group – a Stalinist version, it seemed, of Oprah’s book club.”

As someone who was 15 in 1989, that didn’t sound right to me, so I googled Oprah’s book club and, sure enough, “On September 17, 1996, Oprah announced the start of Oprah's Book Club.” Without giving too much away, the epilogue of the book has Yuri talking about events that happen in 1998, so, technically, the moment of Yuri’s entire narration actually occurs at least ten years after the fact, when the character would be in his mid-20s, if not later. This not only conflicts with the inherent teenage qualities of the narrator’s voice, but also only explains the jarring, anachronistic Oprah reference without excusing it, like having Yuri, in a time-stamped chapter from 1989, comparing his culturally backward Soviet cousin to Borat.

James Callan:

I know I'm supposed to be counterpoint, but I can't argue with that. Toutonghi muffs some period details like that. The Oprah reference caught my eye, though I didn't run down the actual date, but the one I did catch: Yuri several times refers to the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. I double-checked my Milwaukee-native memory with Wikipedia, and I was right: in '89, the Journal and Sentinel were still two separate papers. They didn't merge until '95.

To me, though, that's evidence that Toutonghi's editor was slacking off, not that Toutonghi messed up. (Take back that thank-you in the acknowledgments, Pauls.) He's a Seattle native, so it's not a shock that his grip on Milwaukee culture is off. According to a few reviewers on Amazon, he gets some details of Latvian history and culture wrong, too.

But, frankly, so what? Red Weather doesn't succeed or fail on the accuracy of its details -- Toutonghi's not trying to be Nabokov or Tolkien. The novel's strength is how well it captures the feeling of a first-generation American who's awkward, has a homelife most of his classmates would consider odd, and (as it turns out) hasn't lived nearly a dramatic a life as his close relatives, particularly his father.

I admire that Toutonghi sets up several plotlines that could be an episode of Perfect Strangers -- then ignores them to focus on the heart of the book, Yuri's relationship with his father. Oh, the son of the rabid anti-Communist falls in love with a socialist girl! Hijinks could ensue, but that resolves in a relatively realistic fashion. When slapstick does rear up, the slaps hurt and the sticks draw blood.

We’ll be back next Friday with more.

TO JOIN IN: Visit Bailey Coy Books on Capitol Hill or Santoro's Books in Greenwood, and ask for the Seattlest Book Club discount.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@seattlest.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • David F.

    "...superfluously detailed events..."



    I'm not sure what you are getting at there, Matt. Journalism training knocked a lot of the dteails out of my writing and I've been trying for years to get that stuff back into it. The hard part is when is enough enough with the details.

  • Pauls

    Ha! Well, it's actually really great that folks are reading the book... I mean -- so many writers never get any audience at all. Even Silvie's comments reflect a careful reading of Red Weather, which is something that is pretty cool, overall. But I worry that people won't be honest if they feel that I'll post rebuttals. And, ultimately, there's a lot to learn -- as a writer -- from negative feedback. This is sort of like a writing workshop, actually.

  • You should stick around and rage against us all you like. Especially Silvie.

  • Pauls

    And scratch that "has." It should just be is: "...is necessarily colored..."

  • Pauls

    Ha ha. I love the Internet. If only the New York Times Book Review allowed authors to respond to their critics in this manner!



    Ok. Regarding this silly Oprah objection...



    The book is written in reflection from the "present-day" by a thirty-year-old narrator. Of course Oprah's book club wasn't around in 1989. Not a major revelation to me. The "time stamp" of the chapter doesn't mean that everything being thought by these characters is occuring in exactly that moment. That "moment" is completely fictional -- a reconstructed rendering of "present day 1989" that has is necessarily colored by the narrator's life in 2004.



    None of that changes the fact that "a Stalinist version of Oprah's Book Club," is a great line.



    Anyway. I will go now -- and I won't post any more. It could get silly, I think, especially given my (and any author's) tendency to defend their own work. (But I have to admit I like James' perspective a bit more.)



    I'd also like to go on record as agreeing with Oscar Wilde: Critics are the people who go out onto the battlefield -- after the fight's over -- and shoot the wounded.

  • MvB

    I'm just to the point where cousin Ivan is about to show up. It's been fun reading, discounting the first-novelish aspects, because I once had a crush on a girl who distributed ISO newspapers, which occasioned me popping in at an ISO meeting -- very much like a Seattlest meet-up: actually, lots of beer, talk about blogging/socialism, and vague plans for future growth.

  • Audrey

    I demand more complaining from Silvie!

  • Jack

    I just bought the book. That is all I have to say.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@seattlest.com