http://seattlest.com/2007/03/28/pdbe_ban_in_the_pi_and_the_seattle_times_today.php All comments for PDBE Ban In The P-I And The Seattle Times Today en-us 2009 seattle_katelyn Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss kbhackett@gmail.com kbhackett@gmail.com 60 http://seattlest.com/2007/03/28/pdbe_ban_in_the_pi_and_the_seattle_times_today.php#comment-1052935 http://seattlest.com/2007/03/28/pdbe_ban_in_the_pi_and_the_seattle_times_today.php#comment-1052935 Comments Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:08:38 -0800 <p>Sorry, Ross. I added in Jamie for local (43rd, bringin' it!) color. You're the 48th -- but since you stopped in we'll extend the Seattlest umbrella to the Eastside. Props where props is due! As for the humor, thanks, but I owe it all to the Seattle Times for the set-up. (After thinking it over, I've decided it must be some kinda sneaky reverse psychology on their part.)</p> http://seattlest.com/2007/03/28/pdbe_ban_in_the_pi_and_the_seattle_times_today.php#comment-1052917 http://seattlest.com/2007/03/28/pdbe_ban_in_the_pi_and_the_seattle_times_today.php#comment-1052917 Comments Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:54:48 -0800 <p>I'm sure Rep. Petersen is a sponsor, but when you refer to a bill you usually point out its prime sponsor, and that's ME. Despite my desperate pandering for public notice, thanks for a funny analysis of the two paper's coverage. This is not typically a funny issue, and you've succeeded where I've failed at humor for years.</p>