State of the City? Short a Hundred Police Officers
There's a Seattle Times editorial today that indicates that Mayor Nickels is going to deliver a State of the City speech that calls for additional police resources; 105 new cops over the next five years, which seems a little ridiculous in the World's Safest City. The editorial hints that it shares that viewpoint, but it's not enough to satisfy some who accuse the Times of supporting the mayor's new policing plan.
Here's a clip from the editorial:
The department has already added 49 new officers and rethought their deployment. They would be supplemented by another 105 police officers over a five-year period starting next year. Those are not insignificant numbers, but they pale before proposed new hires bid up by Seattle City Council members. The cost to hire and equip Nickels' recommendation is estimated at $12.5 million a year, to start.Local taxpayers are already paying overtime to stretch the existing 1,100 sworn officers to meet the needs of the city. For all the grousing about government spending, the outrage is rarely aimed at public-safety expenditures.
Ok, it mentions taxpayers paying overtime which to our mind is a small wink towards dissent, but it should be shouting WHY ARE ADDITIONAL COPS A PRIORITY? Check your neighborhood. Is it safe? Granted we live in Wallingford where almost the only time a cop is needed or present is when the U District/Wallingford/Fremont bar-shed empties into Dicks Drive-In every night, but we're really not feeling the need to increase the police force by an additional 10%.


