Quantcast

State of the City? Short a Hundred Police Officers

mini-robocop-792844.bmp.jpgThere's a Seattle Times editorial today that indicates that Mayor Nickels is going to deliver a State of the City speech that calls for additional police resources; 105 new cops over the next five years, which seems a little ridiculous in the World's Safest City. The editorial hints that it shares that viewpoint, but it's not enough to satisfy some who accuse the Times of supporting the mayor's new policing plan.

Here's a clip from the editorial:

The department has already added 49 new officers and rethought their deployment. They would be supplemented by another 105 police officers over a five-year period starting next year. Those are not insignificant numbers, but they pale before proposed new hires bid up by Seattle City Council members. The cost to hire and equip Nickels' recommendation is estimated at $12.5 million a year, to start.

Local taxpayers are already paying overtime to stretch the existing 1,100 sworn officers to meet the needs of the city. For all the grousing about government spending, the outrage is rarely aimed at public-safety expenditures.

Ok, it mentions taxpayers paying overtime which to our mind is a small wink towards dissent, but it should be shouting WHY ARE ADDITIONAL COPS A PRIORITY? Check your neighborhood. Is it safe? Granted we live in Wallingford where almost the only time a cop is needed or present is when the U District/Wallingford/Fremont bar-shed empties into Dicks Drive-In every night, but we're really not feeling the need to increase the police force by an additional 10%.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@seattlest.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Andrew Davis

    MvB, it actually does make my point, if you think about it slightly. Why won't the cops follow up on it? Because they're understaffed and don't have time to follow up on it. Seems pretty simple to me.

  • Nick

    Agreed with Courtney above, South Seattle has very long responses bordering on becoming useless. We have wide spread drug use in cars and alleys, street prostitution and a recent rash of daylight home burglaries. When we had a city councilman at one of our neighborhood meetings recently, it was a consensus that south (CD/ID/Beacon Hill/Rainier Valley and beyond) was very understaffed.



    Happy for you folk up in the North, really I am.

  • Dan

    Taking the stranger thread into consideration...maybe there is some wave of random and violent crime sweeping the city that I've been lucky enough to avoid. Haven't seen it, personally, but apparently it exists. Most of the anecdotes related in that thread seem like they're nightlife-related and the usual response to that kind of thing is more cops standing on the corners and not necessarily more cops following up on random attacks, as mvb indicated above.



    And maybe there's a point behind Nickels' Nightlife Ordinance stuff? That's obviously where he's leading us here.

  • MvB

    Yes, but Andrew, that story doesn't make your point. There were cops around, and they were non-responsive. Hiring 10% more of them doesn't indicate that would create 10% more responsiveness, especially if what we're talking about is the highly visible beat cop (vs. more detectives for actual crime solving).

  • Courtney

    Having actually spoken more than once with a few officers in the East Precinct, and living in the non-Cap-Hill part of said precinct (the CD), I can attest that we still need more cops there. Elsewhere in Seattle? Maybe not. But around my neighborhood they literally only come readily if you call 911 and say someone has been shot--otherwise they're already too understaffed and spread thin.



    Things are different south of the cut, people.

  • Andrew Davis

    "WHY ARE ADDITIONAL COPS A PRIORITY?"



    Are you serious?



    "they informed me that an incident report would be filed but not to expect much" This, after the person assaulted GAVE THEM the license plate number of the assaulter.



    http://www.thestranger.com/blog/2007/03/letter_of_the_day_13

  • Kasa

    Well, the increase in assault for my neighborhood was 377.0, which, combined with stuff I've seen and yesterday's post on the stranger ("Letter of the Day" I think), that's a little worrisome.



    However, I don't think hiring more cops is going to do the trick. I see cops all the damn time. All the problems I've heard in this city are that they simply don't respond. A friend of mine in the UDistrict had a man trying to break into her house one night for over an hour, threatening to kill her (a boyfriend of some girl in her apartment building). She called the cops 5 times, and they never came. That, my friends, is bullshit.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@seattlest.com