<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Art Fight!</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/03/02/art_fight.php</link>
<description>All comments for Art Fight!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>James</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/03/02/art_fight.php#comment-1025254</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/03/02/art_fight.php#comment-1025254</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:12:35 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That&apos;s a good point -- Reid&apos;s main target isn&apos;t, by any means, The Stranger. What I didn&apos;t articulate in the actual article: It&apos;s interesting to me that when Reid mentioned the leading alternative paper, it didn&apos;t cross my mind that he could be talking about the Weekly. 

The Stranger has become part of &quot;the institutional art world.&quot; An unsurprising transition, perhaps, but I think it&apos;s become inarguable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kirsten</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/03/02/art_fight.php#comment-1025236</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/03/02/art_fight.php#comment-1025236</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:54:59 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I highly doubt the Stranger will respond...but I think the piece was a swipe at the art scene in general rather than a pointed dig at the Stranger only. Anyway- the Stranger is up to thier eyeballs in art dirt after Jen Graves slogged about Matthew Kangas...the fur is flyin&apos;!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
