<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: We Are Not These Hands @ Theatre Off Jackson</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/02/12/we_are_not_these_hands_theatre_off_jackson.php</link>
<description>All comments for We Are Not These Hands @ Theatre Off Jackson</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>MvB</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/02/12/we_are_not_these_hands_theatre_off_jackson.php#comment-1014319</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/02/12/we_are_not_these_hands_theatre_off_jackson.php#comment-1014319</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:05:12 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;jlk: I&apos;m not sure if you&apos;re critiquing my review in general, or if you liked the play. If you&apos;re a fan, I&apos;d encourage you to put your two cents in.

Otherwise, that&apos;s not just a program note -- it&apos;s from the website, used as marketing material, and I didn&apos;t think it was particularly representative of the experience. There are two parts to the review: 1) My expectation was one thing and I got another -- and 2) I didn&apos;t think the other thing wasn&apos;t very good, as I indicate in the recap of the play.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jlk</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/02/12/we_are_not_these_hands_theatre_off_jackson.php#comment-1014004</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/02/12/we_are_not_these_hands_theatre_off_jackson.php#comment-1014004</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:46:16 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Since when is it acceptable to judge a play based on the thing or event that inspired the writer?  Or to critique the play based on a proram note? Or even to blame the writer for your own thwarted expectations rather than taking the play at face value?

Perhaps one would do better to evaluate the play that was written rather than the play one wishes had been written.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
