<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Mea Culpa, Mostly</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/03/mea_culpa_mostly.php</link>
<description>All comments for Mea Culpa, Mostly</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>TomB</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/03/mea_culpa_mostly.php#comment-987198</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/01/03/mea_culpa_mostly.php#comment-987198</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:20:27 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The creationist book is in the &quot;inspirational&quot; section of the bookstore. Along with books discussing the local native american legends about the formation of the canyon.

And the store is a private endeavor. It leases space from the NPS and is solely responsible for what is sold there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Loriann</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/03/mea_culpa_mostly.php#comment-985544</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/01/03/mea_culpa_mostly.php#comment-985544</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:54:02 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What about Native American &quot;creationist&quot; books. Are they not allowed in Park bookstores? Seems to me I&apos;ve seen plenty. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>RogerG</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/03/mea_culpa_mostly.php#comment-885380</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/01/03/mea_culpa_mostly.php#comment-885380</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:59:00 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The name of the PEER writer is spelled &apos;Ruch&apos;, rather than &apos;Rook&apos;, and he&apos;s the executive director of the group.

Incidentally, despite being presented as an organization of state and federal natural resource managers, &quot;Anyone, whether a public employee or not, can be a PEER member.&quot;  [quote is from PEER&apos;s website]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ranger X</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/03/mea_culpa_mostly.php#comment-882236</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/01/03/mea_culpa_mostly.php#comment-882236</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:12:08 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This is what I found, too. Read more here. As a former interpretive park ranger, his first claim struck me odd.

If you&apos;re frustrated with what you perceive to be &quot;deliberate ambiguity&quot; on the part of the NPS when it comes to that inane book and the agency&apos;s ongoing inaction, please be precise about that. Otherwise you&apos;re just as guilty of the same frustrating, easily misinterpreted behavior.

Yes! My thoughts exactly! Thank you for fighting misinformation!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>