<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Gun-related Deaths Rising, Sky Falling</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/gunrelated_deaths_rising_sky_falling.php</link>
<description>All comments for Gun-related Deaths Rising, Sky Falling</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>J</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/gunrelated_deaths_rising_sky_falling.php#comment-870696</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/gunrelated_deaths_rising_sky_falling.php#comment-870696</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:58:53 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Using the same dataset as the PI, we came to different conclusions. Here&apos;s our report on first nine months of 2006 (full year data will be available in a month or two). We also have a breakdown for each neighborhood in the city.

Violent crime is up vs. 2005 but overall crime actually dropped about 10% because of big reductions in theft and auto theft. Still, looking at the overall totals of the city probably isn&apos;t as useful as breaking the data down by neighborhood as Seattle (like any large city) has broad diversity of demographics, cultures, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Seth</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/gunrelated_deaths_rising_sky_falling.php#comment-870612</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/gunrelated_deaths_rising_sky_falling.php#comment-870612</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:10:36 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m not sure if &quot;stats aren&apos;t sexy&quot; is as revered a newspaper rule as &quot;if it bleeds it leads&quot; but it should be.

If the P-I really wanted to blow the Times out of the water, they should&apos;ve scooped the Times on that dog belonging to a Seattle couple that got lost in the Memphis airport and is now found. Fly the couple out there, fly a reporter and a photographer out there, snap exclusive pics of the reunion and slap it on the front page with &quot;Memphis Mutt Miracle&quot; as the headline. 

Boom--that&apos;s gonna move newsprint. Conflating stats into a &quot;trend&quot;? Not so much.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>