<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Creationists Jump the Ark</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/creationists_jump_the_ark.php</link>
<description>All comments for Creationists Jump the Ark</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>kevin bracken</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/creationists_jump_the_ark.php#comment-871289</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/creationists_jump_the_ark.php#comment-871289</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:33:22 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This is hilarious :D Gotta love those Christians, always saying something ridiculous.

How old is the world, now? 5,000 years? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Seth</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/creationists_jump_the_ark.php#comment-870855</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/creationists_jump_the_ark.php#comment-870855</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:53:12 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Courtney, why can&apos;t you just love the Lord?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Courtney</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/creationists_jump_the_ark.php#comment-870790</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/creationists_jump_the_ark.php#comment-870790</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:10:25 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Er, here&apos;s what I said over at the Slog after Annie chastised me as well (in a post just following Charles Mudede&apos;s proposition that suggests children be removed from their parents&apos; care if they&apos;re religious):
&quot;Jeez, can&apos;t a girl blows off a little steam? (Yes, I dug around the NPS site and found the same page that Ronald found.) But if you read PEER more closely, the complaint is two-fold: there&apos;s the damn book (that issue dates back to 2003) and then there&apos;s the claim that, under previous NPS leadership, Grand Canyon rangers were pressured to tiptoe around the science if asked. I don&apos;t know that this is true, but when I hear back from the science and PR offices at the Grand Canyon (they are closed today because of Gerald Goddamned Ford) then I&apos;ll write more. Yes, this isn&apos;t brand-spanking new stuff: the PEER press release is re-fanning a fire that purportedly folks from the NPS let die down intentionally, and with a new director at the helm (the second one appointed by Bush, I might add) they&apos;re hoping to get more traction. Fan away, I say...&quot;
As for what the NPS Grand Canyon web site says on that page vs. what is going on with rangers and scientists on staff at the park, I hope to find out when I hear back from someone there. If PEER is distorting the issue, I&apos;ll call shenanigans. In the meantime, I just used this as an excuse for my favorite rant. Anyone from my family reading this (hi mom!) is probably familiar with that old shtick.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mr skin</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/creationists_jump_the_ark.php#comment-870746</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/creationists_jump_the_ark.php#comment-870746</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:30:27 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hah!  That is a good one.  Religious fund whosie whatsis?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ronald</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/creationists_jump_the_ark.php#comment-870737</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2007/01/02/creationists_jump_the_ark.php#comment-870737</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:26:04 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;But wait, Courtney, hasn&apos;t this story been around for the past week? And the claim that the Park Service won&apos;t give the &quot;age&quot; of the Grand Canyon for fear of offending conservatives and creationists...that&apos;s belied by their own website. http://www.nps.gov/grca/naturescience/naturalfeaturesandecosystems.htm

Hey, I&apos;m all for bashing rightwing eejits at every opportunity, but I&apos;m not sure this is one of them.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>