http://seattlest.com/2006/12/20/lsu_vs_washington_whos_in_trouble_here.php All comments for LSU vs. Washington: Who's In Trouble Here? en-us 2009 seattle_katelyn Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss kbhackett@gmail.com kbhackett@gmail.com 60 http://seattlest.com/2006/12/20/lsu_vs_washington_whos_in_trouble_here.php#comment-842636 http://seattlest.com/2006/12/20/lsu_vs_washington_whos_in_trouble_here.php#comment-842636 Comments Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:22:29 -0800 <p>and now I look like an idiot, because I said that LSU beat Texas. Either way, my argument is that LSU has played some tough teams and at least has some experience this season. UW's been playing all cupcakes and lost badly to their test.</p> http://seattlest.com/2006/12/20/lsu_vs_washington_whos_in_trouble_here.php#comment-842633 http://seattlest.com/2006/12/20/lsu_vs_washington_whos_in_trouble_here.php#comment-842633 Comments Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:20:38 -0800 <p>The Huskies aren't in trouble? Let's see, LSU has played a tough Wichita State team (lost a close one), beat Texas A&M and also Texas (on the road)...three pretty solid teams. Huskies...have played exactly one road game and got demolished by Gonzaga. Call me crazy, but at least LSU has been tested and proven itself. UW's only chance so far against the Zags ended in shambles. Nice job with the non-conference schedule, Romar.</p>