Quantcast

Say Goodbye to Husky Stadium

University of Washington Athletic Director Todd Turner revealed plans for the new UW football facility yesterday. (You can forget about it being called Husky Stadium anymore--we're on a downhill path toward "Onvia Field at Husky Stadium" or some similarly awful conceit).

In a nutshell: get rid of the track around the field and and replace the west end with a combination of offices for the athletic department, suites for rich people, and maybe a couple more seats for the riff-raff.
husky_back.PNG

husky_front.PNG

There's also drawings of a stadium without the upper deck on the west end.

One revealing quote from Turner will give you an idea of where the University is heading: "I'm tired of seeing those porta-potties down by the baseball field," he says. "That's not a quality experience."

"A quality experience" will mean a sanitized, boring facility with a new corporate name, designed by a corporate architecture firm, something that could be at any university in the nation (as you can see from the drawings--looks like Coors Field) Most importantly--there will be no indication that Husky fans poo.

A few months from now, Turner will announce the cost of the project, but from the looks of it, it ain't gonna be cheap. Corporate sponsorship is right around the corner.

For lots of boring details, you can read a series of blog posts Turner wrote.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@seattlest.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • MichelleBee

    Hopefully they can install indoor plumbing without having to raise the ticket prices too much!

  • Seth

    I hear you Justin--I'm just not sure that I'm ready for a perfect, gleaming Husky Stadium which only rich people and guys with corporate expense accounts can afford to watch a game in. Every other remodel of Husky Stadium has been about expanding access for more people. This one's about making it a more "quality experience" (read--"raise ticket prices") and getting more luxury boxes for the wealthy. Makes me shudder.

  • Justin

    Seth, you seem so down on these designs. I think it looks beautiful, with a classic charm. I am a season ticket holder who thinks the facilities need an overhaul as much as the offensive line. Who really like to pee in a troff with a bunch of other dudes?

  • dw

    Royal Memorial in Austin still has its track. Ditto Kansas' stadium. And, of course, there's the LA Coliseum. None of them have problems, really.



    Stadiums that have taken out their tracks for football don't always fare well architecturally, e.g. my alma mater's Folsom Field and its weird concrete "ramp" in the south end zone.

  • Seth
  • MvB

    In the interests of reaching consensus, maybe get rid of the track coach?

  • David

    Keep the coach, and get rid of the track.

  • I actually like the idea of getting rid of the track. Other stadiums don't have that gap between the audience and the game. I do wish, however, that instead of a new stadium, they hire a new coach and a better recruiting staff.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@seattlest.com