http://seattlest.com/2006/11/07/holmgren_finally_gets_it.php All comments for Holmgren Finally Gets It en-us 2009 seattle_katelyn Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss kbhackett@gmail.com kbhackett@gmail.com 60 http://seattlest.com/2006/11/07/holmgren_finally_gets_it.php#comment-638064 http://seattlest.com/2006/11/07/holmgren_finally_gets_it.php#comment-638064 Comments Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:42:30 -0800 <p>Clayton's wrong--at least on that game. As bad as Edgerrin James's stats were, Arizona still would've won the game if they hadn't given up a punt return for a touchdown and a fumble return for a touchdown.</p> http://seattlest.com/2006/11/07/holmgren_finally_gets_it.php#comment-637751 http://seattlest.com/2006/11/07/holmgren_finally_gets_it.php#comment-637751 Comments Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:02:04 -0800 <p> I don't know, Seth. I get the feeling that the result was more a function of the opponent than of the strategy. That is to say, the Raiders suck. We could have run against them and won, we could have passed against them and won, we could have just kept handing them the ball and still won. John Clayton wrote a piece a few weeks ago discussing how "running out the clock" is now an outdated concept that doesn't work against the speed and power of top tier, modern day defenses. (looked what happened to Arizona against Chicago a few Monday's ago) http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&id=2633180</p>