Empty Space, Empty Pockets

What's the kindest thing you can say about the Empty Space Theatre closing its doors after 35 years? It can't be this, in the comments section over on the Stranger's Slog:
No more life support for dying theaters. E[mpty] S[pace] should have gone under 10 years ago. Creative destruction is important to arts scenes. Energy that could have gone into pulling together a new theater was dumped into propping up a dying one.
That commenter, friends, is Dan Savage, the Stranger's editor. It's worth following the whole thread because then former Seattle Weekly theatre editor John Longenbaugh lays into Dan, tempers flare, and the commentary spills out of the comment section and into the Slog proper before a bemused readership.
Savage's prescriptive "energetics" reading aside, the real problem with the Empty Space was laid out in the Stranger's pages a while ago by Matthew Richter, in his analysis of the never-ending non-profit shuffle to make ends meet. Truth be told, it's not just mid-sized companies that are struggling. Major arts groups are essentially living paycheck to paycheck, and putting groceries on the credit card. Seattle Symphony, with no symphonic competition as such, just announced a cumulative deficit of over $3 million.
Empty Space's Board Chair, Erik Blachford, put his finger on a sizable problem: the theatre had a budget of $750,000 and had eight board members. That's far too few. 20 or 30 would be in the ballpark. But given the Space's inability to stay put and long history of fiscal struggle, it's likely that that was simply last problem. It must be frustrating to Empty Space supporters that at the end the people who decided to pull the plug are not the founders or the creative team, but the crop of Board members who were left, unable to persuade anyone else to join them.
Comments [rss]
-
John Longenbaugh
-
MvB
-
Seth
-
John Longenbaugh
-
MvB
-
Courtney


