<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Starbucks Location Not In New York Unionizing</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/09/01/starbucks_location_not_in_new_york_unionizing.php</link>
<description>All comments for Starbucks Location Not In New York Unionizing</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>hopey</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/09/01/starbucks_location_not_in_new_york_unionizing.php#comment-330815</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2006/09/01/starbucks_location_not_in_new_york_unionizing.php#comment-330815</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:03:15 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Has anyone else noticed that this so-called union has not been certified by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)? That&apos;s a pretty mandatory step if you&apos;re going to be a real, national Union. Until this &quot;union&quot; is recognized by the NLRB, I agree with those who say this is a case of hipsters playing Wobblie. I think Starbucks will start taking it more seriously when workers in Peoria begin &quot;organizing&quot;, not workers in one of the trendiest Chicago neighborhoods.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>COMTE</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/09/01/starbucks_location_not_in_new_york_unionizing.php#comment-330733</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2006/09/01/starbucks_location_not_in_new_york_unionizing.php#comment-330733</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:41:37 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Good for them!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>