<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Remember Steve Largent&apos;s Son? The One With Spina Bifida? Well...</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/07/14/remember_steve_largents_son_the_one_with_spina_bifida_well.php</link>
<description>All comments for Remember Steve Largent&apos;s Son? The One With Spina Bifida? Well...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Seth</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/07/14/remember_steve_largents_son_the_one_with_spina_bifida_well.php#comment-273037</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2006/07/14/remember_steve_largents_son_the_one_with_spina_bifida_well.php#comment-273037</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:27:26 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it could have been a 15-year-old. It could have been an 8-year-old. Those details weren&apos;t released. You won&apos;t know until the trial.

Point is, a grand jury in Delaware thought it was bad enough to indict him on four *felony* counts of sexual solicitation. That speaks for itself, I think.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Seth</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/07/14/remember_steve_largents_son_the_one_with_spina_bifida_well.php#comment-273027</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2006/07/14/remember_steve_largents_son_the_one_with_spina_bifida_well.php#comment-273027</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:20:07 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This was sent directly to Seattlest via email:

Do you read the articles you link to?

According to the Seattle Times article you cite, Kramer Largent was indicted for something he did a year ago, when he was 19.

The indictment involves one girl, not multiple girls (as your blog entry states).

The law defines underage as under 16.

So, a 19-year-old boy is accused of unwanted advances toward a 15-year-old girl. This could just as easily be a boyfriend-girlfriend situation gone sour (or a false accusation from a family hoping to later pursue a lucrative civil suit against the wealthy Largents) as a &quot;predeliction for underage girls.&quot;

I don&apos;t know or care about Kramer Largent. I do know, and care about, journalistic standards. Blogging like yours drags down the reputation of all bloggers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jjf</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/07/14/remember_steve_largents_son_the_one_with_spina_bifida_well.php#comment-272265</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2006/07/14/remember_steve_largents_son_the_one_with_spina_bifida_well.php#comment-272265</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:56:32 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;gmgmmdmdmktmktmktmkgmtkgtgtgktgtgktkgtgktkgtgktkgtkkgtg
gmtkg
mtktt
tktgm&apos;tgtk
kgeejtnjtnbjtnjtjbjtbjtnbjtnbjnjnrtjgntjgnjtgtngjntjgtjgntjngjtgjkkmkmkkkmkmk
kmkm
kmkm
lmlkm
kmlm
kmm
mkm
kmkm
kmk&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
