Bullshit Rapid Transit
Bus Rapid Transit as an alternative to actual mass transit sucks. It's what anti-transit people offer to cities to ridicule their efforts at light rail or monorails. "You want to move people around without cars, eh? How about this ridiculous thing, then? You can't say no! It isn't a car! Look, it can move people from poor inner suburbs to job sites just as well as elevated trains and it costs nothing so in two years when you shut the hell up and buy another car we can just sell off the buses and the right of ways we grabbed and be done with it." It's like a game of transit chicken with each side wondering how the other could possibly be serious. But then, a few of these systems have actually been implemented.
And they are said to "work" in a few of those places, although the mark of success for BRT is significantly lower than for light rail. If the actual goal is to get people out of their cars and onto transit by choice, no one's going to give up the hybrid for a damn bus. They tend to be most successful at moving people when they're as different from actual buses as possible, so that means lanes of their own, ideally separated from traffic by curbs or medians like in L.A., where they have BRT lines running down old rail right-of-ways. It also means very well-delineated lines. A "green line" for example, although wouldn't that be a kick in the face, might travel down 99 to downtown and another color would be assigned to whatever went south from there. No numbers - People don't take to numbered BRTs, probably because there's no confidence it's anything other than an express bus. Which it isn't.
The P-I has a BRT primer in the paper today which was inspired by Sims' plan for Bus Rapid Transit in Seattle.
What is it? A system in which buses run in exclusive lanes at 10-minute intervals or less, are allowed through traffic lights before other vehicles, have special stations and distinctive buses, sell tickets off the bus to reduce boarding time, and use electronic signs to show when buses are due.
The way they describe it doesn't make it sound at all attractive or feasible, which is probably a good thing, because the farther we stay from BRT the better. Not that even the best description of BRT ever excited anyone about the future or transportation. The Wikipedia entry for BRT is a little better, at least accurately listing BRT's defining characteristics.
Comments [rss]
-
Kenneth
-
Bill
-
Jake of 8bitjoystick.com
-
Bill
-
Ben Schiendelman
-
Jake of 8bitjoystick.com
-
Jake of 8bitjoystick.com


