<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Viaduct The Last Of The Big Ugly Things</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/05/25/viaduct_the_last_of_the_big_ugly_things.php</link>
<description>All comments for Viaduct The Last Of The Big Ugly Things</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Gwen</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/05/25/viaduct_the_last_of_the_big_ugly_things.php#comment-164066</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2006/05/25/viaduct_the_last_of_the_big_ugly_things.php#comment-164066</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 15:58:18 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;FWIW you can read about the current SDOT Alaskan Way Viaduct Emergency Traffic Management and Closure Plan here: http://www.seattle.gov/transportation/viaductemergencyclosure.htm

It came out last July. It does state:

The plan does not restore capacity of the Viaduct. A full or partial closure means moving high volumes of vehicles to alternate routes, many of which are not designed for significant additional capacity to absorb that traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>David Suher</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/05/25/viaduct_the_last_of_the_big_ugly_things.php#comment-164060</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2006/05/25/viaduct_the_last_of_the_big_ugly_things.php#comment-164060</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 15:15:57 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Jason,
What evidence do you have that they are &quot;quite aware&quot; of the issue?
WSDOT did NOT have any sort of Viaduct emergency closure plan until this year -- 2006.
I happen to know because I asked in 2005 because the connection to the PWC plan was obvious and all I got back were lame emails which said &quot;we are working on it.&quot;
Check my blog&apos;s Google seach function if you don&apos;t believe me. I thought WSDOT&apos;s lack of preparedness was scandalous and scary.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jason</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/05/25/viaduct_the_last_of_the_big_ugly_things.php#comment-164057</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2006/05/25/viaduct_the_last_of_the_big_ugly_things.php#comment-164057</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 14:44:49 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;actually, i think they&apos;re quite aware of the implications. that&apos;s what the DOT contingency plans are for. we all realize that a temporary closure (even if temporary means a few years) will be necessary.

extrapolating the temporary contingency plans out to a permanent (tear it all down &amp; replace with nothing) loss, and thinking that it&apos;s a good idea, is a complete failure of logic. promoting healthier behavior is a great thing. permanently crippling our city&apos;s transportation by removing a major artery to prove a point is beyond dumb. if the politicians appear to not be listening to crackpot ideas, they deserve more credit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>David Sucher</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/05/25/viaduct_the_last_of_the_big_ugly_things.php#comment-164055</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2006/05/25/viaduct_the_last_of_the_big_ugly_things.php#comment-164055</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 13:38:39 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Just for the record, I am not really campaigning for  a temporary closure so much as suggesting that contemplating such a closure might be a good idea for those who favor the massive disruption of the Tunnel or the Rebuild, both of which will require a period of many years without the current Viaduct.

I don&apos;t believe that downtown politicians or interests (much less the rest of us) have really started to imagine the disruption which a permament closre will entail.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>