http://seattlest.com/2006/05/24/protecting_digital_rights.php All comments for Protecting Digital Rights en-us 2009 seattle_james Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:30:00 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss scarequotes@gmail.com scarequotes@gmail.com 60 http://seattlest.com/2006/05/24/protecting_digital_rights.php#comment-164149 http://seattlest.com/2006/05/24/protecting_digital_rights.php#comment-164149 Comments Fri, 02 Jun 2006 09:51:18 -0800 <p>OK, so the only example was completely wrong. What other choices would you suggest, Dan?</p> http://seattlest.com/2006/05/24/protecting_digital_rights.php#comment-164041 http://seattlest.com/2006/05/24/protecting_digital_rights.php#comment-164041 Comments Wed, 24 May 2006 15:32:39 -0800 <p>Ok, so "by no means is Apple The Perfect Company" refers in part to that. My point was that there are options when it comes to software and as long as we can elect to use a different platform we have a small say in what degree of DRM we'll put up with. In the specific case of Apple I've found that I'll put up with quite a bit because generally it's worked the way I expect.</p> http://seattlest.com/2006/05/24/protecting_digital_rights.php#comment-164039 http://seattlest.com/2006/05/24/protecting_digital_rights.php#comment-164039 Comments Wed, 24 May 2006 15:17:20 -0800 <p>It's funny you suggest buying a Mac, Apple is the largest DRMd content vendor in the world.</p> http://seattlest.com/2006/05/24/protecting_digital_rights.php#comment-164034 http://seattlest.com/2006/05/24/protecting_digital_rights.php#comment-164034 Comments Wed, 24 May 2006 15:01:53 -0800 <p>Microsoft’ old plans for DRM in Longhorn ( now Vista ) were one of the big reason why I got my iBook and switched to Mac OSX</p>