Is Seattle Disposable?

Like seemingly most people in Seattle, Seattlest is a transplant. From Virginia specifically. This morning we had this article from the New York Times Magazine sent to us [requires registration]. It discusses the difficulty in reaching a consensus on a design for a future expansion of one of the most revered areas on the Grounds of the University of Virginia (Seattlest's alma mater).
For those unfamiliar, the University of Virginia was originally designed by Thomas Jefferson, and the original buildings are considered to be monuments to that period's architecture. Centered around the Pantheon-inspired Rotunda, designed as a library, the original Grounds consisted of the Rotunda, flanked on either side by facing rows of rooms where both students and faculty lived, with a grassy area known as the Lawn in the middle. The end of this area was originally left open for taking in the mountain view, but was eventually closed as part of the University's expansion. That expansion, long a source of contention since it altered the original Jeffersonian vision, is now slated to be demolished and rebuilt. The dilemma created is how exactly to best do that while maintaining the character of the surrounding architecture and the spirit of Jefferson's intent. After five years of intense debate (and resignation from the original design firm), they've only now reached a design agreement. The article is a bit lengthy, but is a very good read if you have even a passing interest in architecture, design, or history and how all of those come together.
Bringing the focus locally, Seattlest can't realy think of any local structures that hold the same degree of reverence demonstrated in the article. The library is a new classic, the Space Needle isn't going anywhere, and even the Market seems to exist as just another part of the landscape, but none of those would seem to evoke the degree of passion demonstrated here (international open letters, architectural manifestos, department rifts). Transportation issues garner a lot of press, but that's not quite the same. So you tell us Seattle: Is anything here sacred? Are there any buildings here that are such a part of Seattle that they're "untouchable"?
Comments [rss]
-
gabbneb
-
Matt Westervelt
-
Robin
-
COMTE
-
Cam
-
Seth
-
Jason
-
Bradford Bohonus
-
Ali Marcus
-
me
-
mike
-
donte
-
Matt Westervelt
-
i d i o t
-
Seth


