Not in My Backyard Lap

Mayor Nickels' campaign to make local strip clubs no fun for anyone popped up on the local radar again yesterday. Turns out Georgetown residents aren't too happy with Nickels' desire to create a strip club zone that borders their neighborhood to the north.
If this zoning change is approved, any new strip clubs in the city would be built there and Georgetown residents would have to explain the sex industry to their impressionable children, and maybe put up with patrons wandering back and forth between local bars and local adult cabarets.
Seattlest is not actually a fan of Nickels' proposal -- we signed the petition to overturn his new regulations, which will be on the ballot in November. We prefer our sexual vice with dimmer lights, able to approach closer than four feet, and spread throughout the city. Why should Georgetown -- or downtown, Ballard, and Lake City -- have all the fun?
But we're also not fans of Georgetown's language -- the strip club debate is framed in terms of "saving" the neighborhood. Anti-zone activists are fond of calling it a "red-light district," which isn't really accurate (these days). No one is proposing legal bordellos in Georgetown.
Have an opinion about the new strip club zoning laws? You can tell Peter Steinbrueck all about it tomorrow night at a public hearing. Head to the second floor of City Hall at 5:30 and let the Urban Planning Committee know what you think local strip clubs should be like, just in case Nickels' proposals aren't overturned in November.
Comments [rss]
-
Erika
-
Durin
-
Courtney
-
Seth
-
Seth
-
Will
-
Posted By
-
James Callan
-
Kevin


