<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Sporting News For Sale</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/02/21/sporting_news_for_sale.php</link>
<description>All comments for Sporting News For Sale</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Dan</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/02/21/sporting_news_for_sale.php#comment-162843</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2006/02/21/sporting_news_for_sale.php#comment-162843</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:29:08 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Even the name invokes an age that&apos;s past.  I open a title like that and I expect the racing sheet and 411 on the latest and greatest pugilists.  

Check this spread from The Sporting News swimsuit edition though.  hot!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Seth</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2006/02/21/sporting_news_for_sale.php#comment-162841</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2006/02/21/sporting_news_for_sale.php#comment-162841</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:58:54 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Sporting News peaked in the 70s, and whatever remaining readers it has are old. Sports Illustrated will be in the same boat soon. Rick Reilly is completely unreadable for anyone under 50. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>