http://seattlest.com/2005/12/28/the_sky_is_falling.php All comments for The Sky Is Falling en-us 2009 seattle_katelyn Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss kbhackett@gmail.com kbhackett@gmail.com 60 http://seattlest.com/2005/12/28/the_sky_is_falling.php#comment-162449 http://seattlest.com/2005/12/28/the_sky_is_falling.php#comment-162449 Comments Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:19:17 -0800 <p>I'm with you on feeling fortunate to have two dailies in operation. I've always felt that the P-I was decidedly left of the Times. The Times shilled for the Iraq war, the P-I didn't. It was also the P-I that bugged the shit out of Dixie Lee Ray when she was the best Republican governor the Democrats ever elected. As for the effect of losing the JOA-beat reporter, I'm thinking the Hearst corporation is capable of defending itself and of calling attention to any transgressions by the Times. It was interesting here when the JOA went down. The publisher of The Weekly, David Brewster, was its most vocal opponent. He felt that they two dailies should fight to the death, leaving a void for The Weekly to fill in the aftermath. He also fretted about monopoly effects on advertising rates. History lesson for ya!</p> http://seattlest.com/2005/12/28/the_sky_is_falling.php#comment-162447 http://seattlest.com/2005/12/28/the_sky_is_falling.php#comment-162447 Comments Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:49:24 -0800 <p>Hold on.. People actually still read newspapers printed on dead tree paper?</p>