<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Endorsement Reviews: Measures &amp; Initiatives</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2005/11/02/endorsement_reviews_measures_initiatives.php</link>
<description>All comments for Endorsement Reviews: Measures &amp; Initiatives</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>8Bit Jake</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2005/11/02/endorsement_reviews_measures_initiatives.php#comment-162049</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2005/11/02/endorsement_reviews_measures_initiatives.php#comment-162049</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:54:16 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;On the day that I run for State Legislature I plan on running on Initiatives Reform. Since it is legal to pay signature gathers less than minimum wage by paying on a per signature basis it is possible to buy a place on the ballot and then buy enough ad time to get it through. Selling our state democracy to the highest bidder is hardly in the spirit of the initiatives process. I would make it illegal to make signature gathers paid less than minimum wage and massive fines if a campaign has fraudulent signatures on their books.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
