<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seattlest: Microsoft Funds Intelligent Design? (No word on when they&apos;ll apply it to software)</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2005/08/26/microsoft_funds_intelligent_design_no_word_on_when_theyll_apply_it_to_software.php</link>
<description>All comments for Microsoft Funds Intelligent Design? (No word on when they&apos;ll apply it to software)</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 seattle_katelyn</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kbhackett@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kbhackett@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Pop Astronaut</title>
<link>http://seattlest.com/2005/08/26/microsoft_funds_intelligent_design_no_word_on_when_theyll_apply_it_to_software.php#comment-161712</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://seattlest.com/2005/08/26/microsoft_funds_intelligent_design_no_word_on_when_theyll_apply_it_to_software.php#comment-161712</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:16:20 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;As a web worker, Microsoft is the bane of my existence.  They&apos;re not good citizens of the tech community and take every chance to wreck great ideas, turn them into MS products and kill the open-source movement. So, it&apos;s with a heavy heart that I find myself defending Emperor Bill.

The premise that the Gates Foundation supports &quot;Intelligent Design&quot; is ridiculous.  Should the foundation have rejected a worthwhile grant application for a specific program because of the political leanings of it&apos;s organization?  Is this scandal material?  C&apos;mon.

I admit this is interesting, so my beef isn&apos;t with you Dan, but with the overwhelming amount of good the Gates Foundation does in our region and around the world, aren&apos;t we kind of missing the boat here?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
